-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
DOC: fix API note about get_tightbbox #12186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
Lets stick with PRs to master and backporting via the bot. It makes sense to do either lots of merge-ups (from 3.0.0-doc -> 3.0.x -> master) or to do lots of backports, but not both. I think we will still do occasional merges up (so that you can see tags from the master branch so versioneer works correctly) but use the backports as the primary way of moving things between branches. |
hmm, tried changing the base and that went...badly. |
9d2c9fb
to
f3b97dd
Compare
Somehow that entry got removed from master. I think I've fixed it now for basing it on master... |
.. and hard cycling... |
doc/api/api_changes.rst
Outdated
returned by `.matplotlib.axes.Axes.get_tightbbox`. | ||
|
||
`.matplotlib.axes.Axes.get_tightbbox` adds a new kwarg ``bbox_extra_artists`` | ||
to specify the manually list of artists on the axes to include in the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not a native speaker, but I feel the "manually" should either be an adjective rather than an adverb or be in another position in the sentence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed!
077a1c9
to
4e47eae
Compare
…186-on-v3.0.0-doc Backport PR #12186 on branch v3.0.0-doc (DOC: fix API note about get_tightbbox)
…186-on-v3.0.x Backport PR #12186 on branch v3.0.x (DOC: fix API note about get_tightbbox)
PR Summary
Made against
3.0.0-doc, but not sure that is correct.master...See discsuiion on gitter. I forgot to mention in the API change for
axes.get_tightbbox
that we'd added a kwarg.PR Checklist