Closed
Description
Bug report
Bug summary
The replacement of ax.figbox as well as suggested replacement code by deprecation warning produce different outputs than what this did for a decade.
Code for reproduction
(part of plotting package)
Actual outcome
Example form 3.4.1
(Pdb) p ax.figbox
Bbox([[0.125, 0.10999999999999999], [0.9, 0.88]])
(Pdb) ax.get_subplotspec().get_position(ax.figure)
Bbox([[0.125, 0.10999999999999999], [0.9, 0.88]])
Expected outcome
Example from 3.3.4
(Pdb) p ax.figbox
Bbox([[0.07234432444852941, 0.07502374387254904], [0.9598087086397059, 0.9739713541666667]])
(Pdb) ax.get_subplotspec().get_position(ax.figure)
Bbox([[0.125, 0.10999999999999999], [0.9, 0.88]])
Obviously, wrong layout messes up output.
Can a function be added that provides the old figbox information?
(Why was it removed in the first place?)
Matplotlib version
- Operating system:
- Matplotlib version (
import matplotlib; print(matplotlib.__version__)): 3.4.1 - Matplotlib backend (
print(matplotlib.get_backend())): Qt5Agg - Python version: 3.9.4
- Jupyter version (if applicable): 7.22.0
- Other libraries: N/A
pip3
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels