-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Consolidate Install Docs #17327
New issue
Have a question 8000 about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Hi @story645 , I would like to take this up. |
go for it! |
Do you want me to remove the entire |
My suggestion is to consolidate everything in the the users/install page & maybe keep the existing files but replace the text with a link back to the install instructions. |
Sounds like a plan. I'm on it :) |
I recommend to keep installation for development in the contribution docs. The two locations address different audiences and having a long page of installation instructions may be intimidating for a simple user (even though he might only need a fraction of the page). Also "Installing for development" is not useful by itself. It needs to be done in context with cloning the repo and setting up a development env (virtualenv/conda/...). On https://matplotlib.org/devdocs/users/installing.html I would add a section "Installing for development" and have there just a link to the contribution docs. |
@timhoffm that's fine with me so long as the install from source docs are in one place. I'm fairly certain the top bug for new contributors is that they're using the wrong install instructions. ETA: like even the mpl install from source docs under user say they're aimed at contributors. I'm not against standalone install from source tarball/release source docs but like that has to be super explicit. |
@story645 does this issue needs work? |
It doesn't seem done to me. We could move any useful info from the FAQ to INSTALL.rst. A quick look at INSTALL.rst, it could probably be trimmed substantially. If we need an "Advanced Installation" page, that might make sense, but I wouldn't call it a FAQ. @rajpratyush if you think you understand the install well enough to try and merge, feel free to give it a shot. |
Yeah, I think this is consolidated enough by now that the actionable pieces mostly don't have much to do with consolidation. |
Installation is documented in at least 4 places:
which can lead to them being out of sync, as seen by the issues targeting only one page in the docs, and can make it harder for new users (especially new contributors) to figure out which instructions they're supposed to be following. I propose the docs get consolidated down to one installation page, the section from the FAQ be removed, and that the developer docs & install.rst should cross link to that install page.
In the process of consolidating the docs, the following issues should probably also at least be addressed:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: