_path.get_extents
does not correctly handle bezier curves
#16830
Labels
Milestone
8000
_path.get_extents
does not correctly handle bezier curves
#16830
Bug report
Bug summary
Currently,
.Path
extents are calculated by_path.h
as simply theBbox
of the control points.For bezier curves, the convex hull of the control points can be easily shown to contain the path. So these extents are a correct upper bound. However, especially for cubic curves, this upper bound will often not be even approximately equal. (See example below).
Some thoughts:
MarkerStyle.normalization
as initially proposed in Sizes of different markers are not perceptually uniform #15703 and discussed in Remove more API deprecated in 3.1 #16772.Path.get_extents
code, and implement aPath.get_exact_extents
to be used uponMarkerStyle.__init__
to pre-calculate/cache theBbox
of that marker.This solution prevents incurring a (presumably significant) performance penalty for something that clearly has not been a big issue in the past, allows us to still quickly compute the Bbox of a collection of markers by adding the appropriate padding to the Bbox of the marker centers, and doesn't change existing API.
Someone who's more familiar with the
Agg
internals is free to translate my Python code if we decide it's worth it to implement a "fast" version of the "correct" solution for use on allPath
's.I will submit a PR to implement
Path.get_exact_extents
Python-side (not much work), but I wanted to open this up for discussion.Code for reproduction
Actual outcome
Expected outcome
See title of plot.
Matplotlib version
print(matplotlib.get_backend())
): qt5aggThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: