8000 Feature request - make it simpler to use full OO interface · Issue #1094 · matplotlib/matplotlib · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
Feature request - make it simpler to use full OO interface #1094
Closed
@astrofrog

Description

@astrofrog

I would like to start using the matplotlib OO interface more, as I would prefer to use this when interactive plotting is not needed. It it slightly faster, and behaves more intuitively in terms of reference counting (pyplot keeps a reference to each figure, meaning that if figures are not closed by pyplot, memory goes out of control).

The reason I don't use it is because it's not easy to remember all the set-up of the canvas and figure:

from matplotlib.backends.backend_agg import FigureCanvasAgg as FigureCanvas
from matplotlib.figure import Figure

fig = Figure()
canvas = FigureCanvas(fig)
ax = fig.add_subplot(1, 1, 1)
ax.scatter(np.random.random(10), np.random.random(10))
fig.savefig('test.png')

So I was wondering whether it would be possible to make Figure more intelligent in terms of canvas? The 'ideal' API in my mind would be:

from matplotlib.figure import Figure

fig = Figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(1, 1, 1)
ax.scatter(np.random.random(10), np.random.random(10))
fig.savefig('test.png')

i.e. I want the figure to just use the default backend (since this is set at the root level of matplotlib, not pyplot). So I would expect the following to work:

import matplotlib
matplotlib.use('Agg')
from matplotlib.figure import Figure

fig = Figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(1, 1, 1)
ax.scatter(np.random.random(10), np.random.random(10))
fig.savefig('test.png')

and to use the non-interactive Agg backend.

Is this something that has been considered before?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      0