8000 ESP32 support · Issue #118 · luc-github/ESP3D · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

ESP32 support #118

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
luc-github opened this issue Sep 11, 2016 · 52 comments
Closed

ESP32 support #118

luc-github opened this issue Sep 11, 2016 · 52 comments
Labels
enhancement ESP32 Feature request Fixed outdated

Comments

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner

ESP32 is out need to support it
@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author
luc-github commented Nov 12, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Ok got my nano32 and play with https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32
so far still need to wait for EEPROM and Webserver library - a lot of debug message are on output
need to change detection flag to ESP_PLATFORM instead of ARDUINO_ARCH_ESP8266

Keep watching until official first release

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

SDK is not yet ready : EEPROM, Sync WebServer, SD libraries are still under development or planned

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

Based on current ESP32 status - the FW will need some rewrite so better to have dedicated github when time will be (soon 😉 )

@luc-github luc-github reopened this Sep 17, 2017
@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author
luc-github commented Sep 17, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Reopening as now most of necessary library are now available

Porting already started so I will create a branch for it soon

Current main issue is web server - embeded page is working but streamfile function is not
first draft is not really clean as I have #ifdef ARDUINO_ARCH_ESP8266 and #ifdef ARDUINO_ARCH_ESP32 everywhere so need to do some code refactoring using global macro once all needed functions will be identified

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

Ok problem solved using proper library for web server : https://github.com/bbx10/WebServer_tng

@nostahl
Copy link
nostahl commented Sep 19, 2017

keep up the good work! I've been keeping eye on this project for long time now.

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

Thank you
for the moment everything seems now fixed and working but :

  • NetBios due to lack of available library
  • SSDP due to lack of available library
  • Silent boot so will move output from Serial to Serial1 and avoid the bootloader message and missing swap function
  • baudrate function -> need to do a PR
  • setRxBufferSize -> need to do a PR or ignore it as default is 256

so very promising 😸

@nostahl
Copy link
nostahl commented Sep 20, 2017

Is there possibility for arducam or some offering that's not a separate up cam too?

@nostahl
Copy link
nostahl commented Sep 20, 2017

Ip cam

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author
luc-github commented Sep 21, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Well I already studied that #82
Even ESP32 is definitly better for this purpose as more pins and more powerful the arducam module is not cheap and cannot compare with cheap IP cam.
I am not expert in video stream neither electronic so would need a lot of time for me to find a very cheap compatible video module if exists.

if there is some code and really cheap compatible camera I am open to give a try

but when you see ip came ra like this around 20box that won't overload the esp and can be integrated in UI easily as cam address is now handled - does it really worth all the efforts ?

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

baudRate PR (espressif/arduino-esp32#651) done but UART Driver may have issue, so need an update: espressif/arduino-esp32#649

@me-no-dev
Copy link

I love everything about this project but one thing ;) it's not Async :P

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

Thank you
well this in pipe (#110), soon I will release a big update for SDCard as serial upload is slow like hell, but I cannot release the code publicly yet , also I am worry to do async upload(s) to SD but it will come eventually...
Using Async as it is , it is easy as you did all the crazy job ^_^, (I saw when debugging the upload issue) - but adding more code on async scare me a little haha

@me-no-dev
Copy link

what are you scared of :D async does not bite :P

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author
luc-github commented Sep 21, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Porting update:

  • Better to use Serial 2 as default output because Serial 1 use same pins (9/10) as flash D2/D3 and QIO is default mode instead of DIO, so if user do pay attention when compiling, ESP will go to endless restart

  • Need to check ESP32 SPIFFS upload speed vs ESP8266: it seems really slower but need to benchmark to confirm

  • Need to confirm no OTA with 2Mb boards according https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/blob/master/tools/partitions/minimal.csv (confirmed)

@me-no-dev
Copy link

Serial 1 use same pins (9/10) as flash D2/D3

you can use any pins (almost)

@me-no-dev
Copy link

Need to check ESP32 SPIFFS upload speed

hold on for a day or two ;) there is a bug in spiffs and fix is coming

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

@me-no-dev thanks a lot 😸

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

Porting update:

  • Need to redo the travis scripts to implement ESP32
  • NetBios/SSDP libraries are still missing
  • Serial instead of Serial2 can be used if GPIO15 is set to GND (thanks Me-No-Dev)
  • Need to review SPIFFS upload performance on ESP32 vs ESP8266
  • Need heavy testing

So I will push it to devt branch this week

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author
luc-github commented Oct 7, 2017 •
edited
Loading

I just did some bench and SPIFFS itself is not slow - it is the upload which is slower :
for same file size it take 2.6 times more on ESP32 vs ESP8266

Data ESP8266 ESP32
total Upload 14284ms 37664ms
Write time 13248ms 1911ms
File size 381216B 381216B

@me-no-dev
Copy link

what do you mean by upload? is the flash frequency the same? SPIFFS clean? all of those can result in different speeds

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author
luc-github commented Oct 8, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Hi @me-no-dev welcome back ^_^ no Jet lag ?
I mean file upload to SPIFFS using browser :
image

@me-no-dev
Copy link

Oh lots of jetlag... i am not sure if I am awake or sleeping :D check flash freq ;) default might be 40MHz and you can try 80 (also make sure FS is clean)

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author
luc-github commented Oct 8, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Ok ESP32 is now part of devt branch - still need to update travis but code and readme is there now :
https://github.com/luc-github/ESP3D/tree/devt

Edit: travis is now updated and compile ESP8266 as well as ESP32 🎆

@me-no-dev
Copy link

Here is a Speed Test I did today on ESP32 and ESP8266 without going through FS. Upload used the same 61912518 B file (same size for Download too):

  • ESP32 Upload: 3.99 Mbps
  • ESP32 Download: 8.32 Mbps
  • ESP8266 Upload: 9.68 Mbps
  • ESP8266 Download: 8.46 Mbps

Following handlers used:

    server.on("/upload", HTTP_GET, [](AsyncWebServerRequest *request){
      request->send(200, "text/html", "<form method='POST' action='/upload' enctype='multipart/form-data'><input type='file' name='test'><input type='submit' value='Update'></form>");
    });

    server.on("/download", HTTP_GET, [](AsyncWebServerRequest *request){
        AsyncWebServerResponse *response = request->beginResponse("text/plain", 61912518, [](uint8_t *buffer, size_t maxLen, size_t index) -> size_t {
          if(!index){
              Serial.printf("DownloadStart: (%lu)\n", millis());
          }
          memset(buffer, '0', maxLen);
          if((index + maxLen) == 61912518){
              Serial.printf("DownloadEnd: (%lu)\n", millis());
          }
          return maxLen;
        });
        response->addHeader("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=\"test.txt\"");
        request->send(response);
    });

@me-no-dev
Copy link

Did a new test with my PC connected to Ethernet instead of WiFi. Here are the results ;)

  • ESP32 STA Upload: 8.66 Mbps
  • ESP32 STA Download: 9.02 Mbps
  • ESP32 AP Upload: 7.94 Mbps
  • ESP32 AP Download: 9.40 Mbps
  • ESP32 ETH Upload: 15.53 Mbps
  • ESP32 ETH Download: 23.12 Mbps
  • ESP8266 STA Upload: 9.65 Mbps
  • ESP8266 STA Download: 11.81 Mbps
  • ESP8266 AP Upload: 7.45 Mbps
  • ESP8266 AP Download: 9.27 Mbps

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author
luc-github commented Oct 9, 2017 •
edited
Loading

I see what you want ^_^ - you want me to use AsyncWebServer instead of Sync one -

no worry I plan to do it 😉 but better to have stable sync version to compare and move to Async

your first data are interesting because they match mine (I did not tested download because it looked fine for me) :

  • ESP32 Upload: 3.99 Mbps
  • ESP8266 Upload: 9.68 Mbps
    ESP32 is 2.4 slower than ESP8266 in upload on my side was 2.6 on smaller sized file which increase unaccuracy

about your second part using PC to Ethernet instead of Wifi - (this is what I used to do my tests also) :

  • ESP32 ETH Upload: 15.53 Mbps (1.6 faster than ESP8266)
  • ESP32 STA Upload: 8.66 Mbps (1.1 slower than ESP8266)
  • ESP8266 STA Upload: 9.65 Mbps
    ESP8266 looks identical but ESP32 is now almost as fast as ESP8266 so I am confused, ESP8266 should be affected as well no ?

for ESP32 ETH I do not have such device so I cannot test

@me-no-dev
Copy link

how is 15 Mbps slower than ESP8266 :D

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

Arf morning sorry .... I correct

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

Another difference between ESP8266 and ESP32 is format SPIFFS :
On ESP8266 the output is clean but on ESP32 the WD generate message:

Task watchdog got triggered. The following tasks did not feed the watchdog in time:
Tasks currently running:
CPU 0: ipc0
CPU 1: loopTask
Task watchdog got triggered. The following tasks did not feed the watchdog in time:
Tasks currently running:
CPU 0: ipc0
CPU 1: loopTask

Need a yield() or something during the loop of erasing sector ? the original SPIFFS library do not have but this does not trigger ESP8266 which has a bigger SPIFFS (3M vs 1.31M)

@me-no-dev
Copy link

I'll make a few assumptions here ;)

  • you are using Arduino as IDF component
  • You have enabled WDT on idle task of Core 1

Disable idle task WDT in menuconfig as it's done in Arduino and you will be fine.

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author
luc-github commented Oct 10, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Hi @me-no-dev no I use arduino-esp32
but I checked sdkconfig present in SDk as you suggest and seems WDT is not enable on idle task for CPU1

CONFIG_INT_WDT_CHECK_CPU1=y
CONFIG_TASK_WDT=y
CONFIG_TASK_WDT_PANIC=
CONFIG_TASK_WDT_TIMEOUT_S=5
CONFIG_TASK_WDT_CHECK_IDLE_TASK=y
CONFIG_TASK_WDT_CHECK_IDLE_TASK_CPU1=

@me-no-dev
Copy link

yeah... but I have no issues formatting SPIFFS, so I am not sure where and how you are getting this if WDT is not enabled

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

Formating is working fine actually - just getting output but any output is a possible issue if go to 3D printer

I will try use aduino as component, check the menu config to see if it make difference - may be the sdkconfig present in sdk directory is not the real one but an old one

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

Hi @me-no-dev
After compiling arduino as idf component using sdk sdconfig I get same result

So using make menuconfig I have disabled WDT on idle task on CPU0 ( I do not see CPU1 in UI but it is present in original sdk sdconfig)
image

no more output during formating - so I guess setting is not used
when I check at the new sdconfig generated
no more
CONFIG_TASK_WDT_CHECK_IDLE_TASK_CPU1=
but instead
CONFIG_TASK_WDT_CHECK_IDLE_TASK=
So I guess the issue is default sdconfig used to esp-arduino is no more valid and need to be generated again

@me-no-dev
Copy link

strange... will be done in next lib rebuild

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author
luc-github commented Oct 11, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Do you want me to create issue in esp-arduino tracker ?

@me-no-dev
Copy link

nope ;) i need to do it anyway

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

Ok Boss - thank you ^_^

@kafftass
Copy link

Hi ESP3D Folks , what a great work.
I think this project will have a great future, because with ESP32 the platform is more powerful.
I tested the Dev on a ESP32, what a great jump to the 8266 version i have tested before.
The UI is yery good , on PC and smartphone, and fast.
AND, this project is a very good toolkit to do more/other with the ESP32
Thx a lot.

I must changed some code in wificonfig.cpp. I could not get a connection in STA mode to my WLAN.
I put the setup PHY_MODE section before i set the Station Mode. And disable WiFi.enableAP(false) Now it works for me
Line 340
//WiFi.enableAP(false);
delay(100);
//setup PHY_MODE
if (!CONFIG::read_byte(EP_STA_PHY_MODE, &bflag )) {
return false;
}
#ifdef ARDUINO_ARCH_ESP32
esp_wifi_set_protocol(ESP_IF_WIFI_STA, bflag);
#else
WiFi.setPhyMode((WiFiPhyMode_t)bflag);
#endif
//setup station mode
WiFi.mode(WIFI_STA);
delay(100);

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author
luc-github commented Oct 20, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Thank you
I have 2 different ESP32 and not such issue
the line you commented is not supposed to block STA but to be sure it use STA only so I feel strange it is a problem
Edit: I have read up side down and putting PHY mode after make the feature not to be used so I suspect more the PHY value is not supported for your network
when you say it is not working : the ESP crash or cannot connect to AP ? what is error message for not connecting ?

@kafftass
Copy link

Today i got ready built modules with WROOM32 Chips and have the same issue with the original code.
First i thought it was because i build the first module by myself with a barebone ESP32 Chip.
But that seems not to bee the solution. Because it is working fine with this changes described before it is no great issue for me.
I use WPA2 WLAN security in conjunction with a Fritz-Box 6490, with the standard code he tries to connect and went into AP mode after a while. With the changed code it is connected after 3-5 tries ( connecting ...)
really nice project

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author
luc-github commented Oct 28, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Ok I can reproduce your issue on one fresh module - but same code is working on other ESP32
The difference is old ESP32 was connected initially using ESP sample not full ESP3D code
I suspect some default setting not being initialized - originaly this sequence was done to avoid crash to fresh ESP8266 - so It seems now the oposite happen on ESP but instead of crashing it does not connect

May I ask you to confirm now your module is able to connect with your modification to revert and flash original code to see if issue is still there ?

I will dig in on my fresh module

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

Well even after able to connect - reverting code still have issue on fresh board but not on old one -

Could be a silicon issue ? Anyway applying the move of phy mode seems solving issue and also working on old board - so all boards are able to connect now

good catch @kafftass I pushed the fix : df9ec26
Thank you

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

Ok now ESP32 is supported with today core limitation (SSDP/NetBIOS not yet available) I think it is Ok to close issue

Thank you

@luc-github
Copy link
Owner Author

I have ported SSDP/NetBIOS libraries https://github.com/luc-github/ESP32SSDP https://github.com/luc-github/ESP32NETBIOS

So now definitly 100% compatible - Update will be in 2.X

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement ESP32 Feature request Fixed outdated
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@nostahl @luc-github @me-no-dev @kafftass
0