8000 conformance: normative test for backend client certificate in Gateway by snorwin · Pull Request #4119 · kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

conformance: normative test for backend client certificate in Gateway #4119

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

conformance: normative test for backend client certificate in Gateway #4119

wants to merge 2 commits into from
+259 −12

Conversation

snorwin
Copy link
Member
@snorwin snorwin commented Sep 24, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind test
/area conformance-test

What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds a normative conformance test for .spec.tls.backend.clientCertificateRef. The test verifies that the configured client certificate is presented when connecting to a backend over TLS.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Sep 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/test area/conformance-test Issues or PRs related to Conformance tests. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: snorwin
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign robscott for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 24, 2025
@snorwin
Copy link
Member Author
snorwin commented Sep 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

/cc @rikatz @kl52752

No rush on this, just whenever you have a moment. I was working on the feature in our implementation and thought it might be a good idea to propose a conformance test early.

@rikatz
Copy link
Member
rikatz commented Sep 26, 2025

/assign
Will take a look next week :D happy weekend!

@snorwin
Copy link
Member Author
snorwin commented Sep 29, 2025

/test all

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@LiorLieberman LiorLieberman Awaiting requested review from LiorLieberman

@youngnick youngnick Awaiting requested review from youngnick

@kl52752 kl52752 Awaiting requested review from kl52752

@rikatz rikatz Awaiting requested review from rikatz

Assignees

@rikatz rikatz

Labels
area/conformance-test Issues or PRs related to Conformance tests. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/test release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@snorwin @k8s-ci-robot @rikatz
0