-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
Dynamo compilation of SDXL, SDXL Refiner, SDXL ControlNet have no performance improvements after save/load #6686
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Not a diffusers bug |
it seems os. SD not working too
Is there a workaround? |
Does upgrading to PyTorch nightly work? |
@Alexadar when calling You will have to compile the module again I'm afraid. |
Maybe its possible to pickle serialised unets and load them manually ? I tried, no use, maybe because that pytorch bug needs some workaround |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If you think this still needs to be addressed please comment on this thread. Please note that issues that do not follow the contributing guidelines are likely to be ignored. |
Seems like the issue is on the PyTorch side? |
can we close this issue now? |
It seems, yep. Closed |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Describe the bug
Dynamo compilation of SDXL, SDXL Refiner, SDXL ControlNet have no performance improvements if you
Reproduction
SDXL:
SDXL REFINER
SDXL Controlnet
Each of the examples have no performance gains after loading of saved compiled weights
Logs
No response
System Info
diffusers
version: 0.26.0.dev0Who can help?
@DN6 @yiyixuxu @sayakpaul @patrickvonplaten
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: