You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When all compilation finishes or the number of JIT-ed code reaches
--jit-max-cache, this compacts all generated code to a single .so file
and re-loads all methods from it.
In the future, it may trigger compaction more frequently and/or limit
the maximum times of compaction to prevent unlimited memory usage.
So the current behavior is experimental, but at least the performance
improvement in this commit won't be removed.
=== Benchmark ===
In this benchmark, I'll compare following four conditions:
* trunk: r64082
* trunk JIT: r64082 w/ --jit
* single-so JIT: This commit w/ --jit
* objfcn JIT: This branch https://github.com/k0kubun/ruby/tree/objfcn w/ --jit,
which is shinh's objfcn https://github.com/shinh/ruby/tree/objfcn rebased from this commit
```
$ uname -a
Linux bionic 4.15.0-29-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 17 15:39:52 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
```
* Micro benchmark
Using this script https://gist.github.com/k0kubun/10e6d3387c9ab1b134622b2c9d76ef51,
calls some amount of different methods that just return `nil`. The following tables
are its average duration seconds of 3 measurements.
Smaller is better.
** 1 method (seconds)
| | trunk | trunk JIT | single-so JIT | objfcn JIT |
|:------|:------------------|:------------------|:------------------|:------------------|
| Time | 5.576067774333296 | 5.915551971666446 | 5.833641665666619 | 5.845915191666639 |
| Ratio | 1.00x | 1.06x | 1.05x | 1.05x |
** 50 methods (seconds)
| | trunk | trunk JIT | single-so JIT | objfcn JIT |
|:------|:------------------|:------------------|:------------------|:------------------|
| Time | 3.1661167996666677| 6.125825928333342 | 4.135432743666665 | 3.750358728333348 |
| Ratio | 1.00x | 1.93x | 1.31x | 1.18x |
** 1500 methods (seconds)
| | trunk | trunk JIT | single-so JIT | objfcn JIT |
|:------|:------------------|:------------------|:------------------|:------------------|
| Time | 5.971650823666664 | 19.579182102999994| 10.511108153999961| 10.854653588999932|
| Ratio | 1.00x | 3.28x | 1.76x | 1.82x |
* Discourse
Using the same benchmark strategy as https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14490 with
this branch https://github.com/k0kubun/discourse/commits/benchmark2 forked from discourse
v1.8.11 to support running trunk.
1. Run ruby script/bench.rb to warm up profiling database
2. Run RUBYOPT='--jit-verbose=1 --jit-max-cache=10000' RAILS_ENV=profile bin/puma -e production
3. WAIT 5-15 or so minutes for all jitting to stop so we have no cross talk
4. Run ab -n 100 http://localhost:9292/
5. Wait for all new jitting to finish
6. Run ab -n 100 http://localhost:9292/
** Response time (ms)
Here is the response time milliseconds for each percentile.
Skipping 99%ile because it's the same as 100%ile in 100 calls.
| | trunk| trunk|single|objfcn|
| | | JIT|so JIT| JIT|
|:----|:-----|:-----|:-----|:-----|
| 50% | 38 | 45 | 41 | 43 |
| 66% | 39 | 50 | 44 | 44 |
| 75% | 47 | 51 | 46 | 45 |
| 80% | 49 | 52 | 47 | 47 |
| 90% | 50 | 63 | 50 | 52 |
| 95% | 60 | 79 | 52 | 55 |
| 98% | 91 | 114 | 91 | 91 |
|100% | 97 | 133 | 96 | 99 |
** Ratio (smaller is better)
Here is the response time increase ratio against no-JIT trunk's one.
| | trunk| trunk|single|objfcn|
| | | JIT|so JIT| JIT|
|:----|:-----|:-----|:-----|:-----|
| 50% | 1.00x| 1.18x| 1.08x| 1.13x|
| 66% | 1.00x| 1.28x| 1.13x| 1.13x|
| 75% | 1.00x| 1.09x| 0.98x| 0.96x|
| 80% | 1.00x| 1.06x| 0.96x| 0.96x|
| 90% | 1.00x| 1.26x| 1.00x| 1.04x|
| 95% | 1.00x| 1.32x| 0.87x| 0.92x|
| 98% | 1.00x| 1.25x| 1.00x| 1.00x|
|100% | 1.00x| 1.37x| 0.99x| 1.02x|
While 50 and 60 %ile are still worse than no-JIT trunk, 75, 80, 90, 95,
98 and 100% are not slower than that.
So now it's a little harder to say "MJIT slows down Rails applications".
Probably I can close [Bug #14490] now. Let's start improving it.
Closeruby#1921
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@64094 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
0 commit comments