8000 Compile bug: MTT S4000 compile error · Issue #13819 · ggml-org/llama.cpp · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Compile bug: MTT S4000 compile error #13819

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
murarduino opened this issue May 27, 2025 · 3 comments
Closed

Compile bug: MTT S4000 compile error #13819

murarduino opened this issue May 27, 2025 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@murarduino
Copy link

Git commit

cdf94a1

Operating systems

Linux

GGML backends

Musa

Problem description & steps to reproduce

I tried renting a server with 4 MTT S4000 GPUs at AutoDL to test the deployment of llama.cpp. Operating system is Ubuntu 22.04, using the latest clone llama.cpp first confirm that mthreads-gmi can display GPU situation properly, because I believe MTT driver and MUSA SDK should be installed properly

Compile according to MUSA instructions in build.md
cmake -B build -DGGML_MUSA=ON

When I execute build
cmake --build build --config Release
the following error occurs

First Bad Commit

cmake --build build --config Release
[ 3%] Built target ggml-base
[ 3%] Building CXX object ggml/src/ggml-musa/CMakeFiles/ggml-musa.dir/mudnn.cu.o
/root/llama.cpp/ggml/src/ggml-musa/mudnn.cu:25:29: error: no member named 'EXECUTION_FAILED' in 'musa::dnn::Status'
case mudnn::Status::EXECUTION_FAILED:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
1 error generated when compiling for mp_21.
gmake[2]: *** [ggml/src/ggml-musa/CMakeFiles/ggml-musa.dir/build.make:1168: ggml/src/ggml-musa/CMakeFiles/ggml-musa.dir/mudnn.cu.o] Error 1
gmake[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1783: ggml/src/ggml-musa/CMakeFiles/ggml-musa.dir/all] Error 2
gmake: *** [Makefile:146: all] Error 2

Compile command

cmake -B build -DGGML_MUSA=ON
cmake --build build --config Release

Relevant log output

No log file provided
@yeahdongcn
Copy link
Collaborator

We've recently switched to MUSA SDK rc4.0.1 (see #13647 for more info), but I noticed that AutoDL is still using an older version (rc3.1.0) for now.

@yeahdongcn yeahdongcn self-assigned this May 27, 2025
@yeahdongcn
Copy link
Collaborator

You might want to reset to an earlier commit for a successful build.
Note: Our previously tested version is MUSA SDK rc3.1.1, which is still different from the one used in the AutoDL instance.

@murarduino
Copy link
Author

You might want to reset to an earlier commit for a successful build. Note: Our previously tested version is MUSA SDK rc3.1.1, which is still different from the one used in the AutoDL instance.

Thank you for your response.
I have submitted the issue to AutoDL's customer service. AutoDL may help me upgrade the version of MUSA SDK. In addition, it was also communicated with MTheads that a new version of cloud resources may be used for testing in the later stage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
0