8000 MSTest - add a new option to have explicit `Program.cs` · Issue #48904 · dotnet/sdk · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

MSTest - add a new option to have explicit Program.cs #48 8000 904

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
Evangelink opened this issue Aug 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

MSTest - add a new option to have explicit Program.cs #48904

Evangelink opened this issue Aug 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@mariam-abdulla
Labels
Area-Test templates enhancement

Comments

@Evangelink
Copy link
Member

MSTest templates are using MSTest.Sdk and are currently relying on the auto-generated entry point. I think it's a good idea to make the entry point explicit as it is then easier for users to understand how they can plug into the test application.

My suggestion is to introduce a new option (CLI + VS) to have explicit entry point (vs auto-generated) and to have the explicit as default.

This requires MSTest 3.6 to be released.
@Evangelink
Copy link
Member Author

@mariam-abdulla Let me know if the task isn't clear enough so we could sync about it.

@Evangelink Evangelink mentioned this issue Dec 6, 2024
Merged
@Evangelink Evangelink transferred this issue from dotnet/test-templates May 12, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the untriaged Request triage from a team member label May 12, 2025
@Evangelink Evangelink added Area-Test templates and removed untriaged Request triage from a team member labels May 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mariam-abdulla mariam-abdulla

Labels
Area-Test templates enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Evangelink @mariam-abdulla
0