Closed as not planned
Description
With 2000 workspaces and sending web terminal traffic to 30% of them (600), we see that coder memory usage shoots up.
The OOM kill did not happen, however, before we also started a concurrent workspace app proxying test. But I suppose web term and workspace apps function on much the same principle.
From the heap, we can observe that a lot of this memory is allocated by WireGuard:
<
60E2
/a>
IIRC, single tailnet was supposed to help with this. So I'm wondering if this is a regression?
// ping @coadler @spikecurtis