8000 Starting with PR10122 build, boards can't storage.remount False in boot.py · Issue #10167 · adafruit/circuitpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Starting with PR10122 build, boards can't storage.remount False in boot.py #10167

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
RetiredWizard opened this issue Mar 22, 2025 · 3 comments
Closed
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@RetiredWizard
Copy link

CircuitPython version and board name

Adafruit CircuitPython 9.2.4-310-gca0eec3f1a on 2025-03-11; Adafruit Feather ESP32-S3 Reverse TFT with ESP32S3

Code/REPL

# Actually boot.py, not code.py
import storage
storage.remount("/",False)

Behavior

Adafruit CircuitPython 9.2.4-310-gca0eec3f1a on 2025-03-11; Adafruit Feather ESP32-S3 Reverse TFT with ESP32S3
Board ID:adafruit_feather_esp32s3_reverse_tft
UID:0740D1DC2800
boot.py output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "boot.py", line 2, in <module>
RuntimeError: Cannot remount '/' when visible via USB.

Description

File system access can't be configured for microcontroller access starting with the adafruit-circuitpython-adafruit_feather_esp32s3_reverse_tft-en_US-20250311-main-PR10122-ca0eec3.uf2 build.

Additional information

I first noticed this on the Waveshare ESP32S3 Geek board and then tested the reverse TFT to make sure it wasn't a problem with the device.

@RetiredWizard RetiredWizard changed the title Starting with PR10122 build, S3 boards can't storage.remount False in boot.py Starting with PR10122 build, boards can't storage.remount False in boot.py Mar 22, 2025
@RetiredWizard
Copy link
Author

This is also happening on an Adafruit_feather_rp2350 so it's not limited to Esspressif/S3.....

@dhalbert
Copy link
Collaborator

This will be a high priority to fix.

@dhalbert
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixed by #10168

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
0