-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
Tailwind v4 css configuration #8649
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This reverts commit 3bfb95e.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8649 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.11% 99.11%
=======================================
Files 141 141
Lines 4073 4073
=======================================
Hits 4037 4037
Misses 36 36 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
@mgrunberg Would the configuration be simplified if the view files were published in the NPM package, similar to what #8220 was trying to achieve? I think that would remove the need for the |
@hasghari Thanks for the contribution, but I'm not ready to reopen the #8220 discussion. That's why I'm still referencing gem files. Speaking about simplicity, I do have the idea of reducing the usage of |
Hey! I've successfully moved to tailwind v4 by having both javascript and css configurations within the same setup. Full configuration is here: https://gist.github.com/amkisko/af1b2f7dc4f0f941437ea16400277864 The idea is to use "old" way with custom rake task and javascript configuration file for resolving dynamic paths in pair with |
Built on top of #8640
Exploring an idea to move from javascript config to CSS config.
Pros: Use the latest tailwind configuration mechanism (clean IMO).
Cons: There won't be a single way to configure tailwind.