CUESTIONARIO PARA VALORAR CONOCIMIENTOS
1. DATOS GENERALES
    NOMBRE DEL APRENDIZ:                              MAYRA GABRIELA PLAZAS LOPEZ
    No FICHA:                                         1897633
    NOMBRE DEL INSTRUCTOR:                            LINA MARCELA CAMARGO RUIZ
    PROGRAMA DE FORMACIÓN:                                  TECHNOLOGIST          IN     OCCUPATIONAL          HEALTH       AND     SAFETY
                                                            MANAGEMENT
    PROYECTO ASOCIADO:                                      ENGLISH
    ACTIVIDAD DE PROYECTO:                                  CUESTIONARIO PARA EVALUAR CONOCIMIENTOS
    ACTIVIDAD DE APRENDIZAJE:                               RISK AT WORK
    COMPETENCIA:                                            PRODUCIR TEXTOS EN INGLÉS EN FORMA ESCRITA Y ORAL
    RESULTADO DE APRENDIZAJE:                                         IDENTIFICAR FORMAS GRAMATICALES BÁSICAS EN TEXTOS Y
                                                                       DOCUMENTOS ELEMENTALES ESCRITOS EN INGLÉS.
                                                                      BUSCAR    DE   MANERA   SISTEMÁTICA    INFORMACIÓN
                                                                       ESPECÍFICA Y DETALLADA EN ESCRITOS EN INGLÉS, MAS
                                                                       ESTRUCTURADOS Y CON MAYOR CONTENIDO TÉCNICO.
                                                                      COMPRENDER LAS IDEAS PRINCIPALES DE TEXTOS
                                                                       COMPLEJOS EN INGLÉS QUE TRATAN DE TEMAS TANTO
                                                                       CONCRETOS COMO ABSTRACTOS, INCLUSO SI SON DEL
                                                                       AREA
    Descripción de la evidencia
    El aprendiz debe desarrollar un taller en el cual desarrollará actividades de forma escrita y oral en un nivel básico de inglés dentro de
    contextos sociales y laborales
    Criterios de evaluación:
        Interpreta textos básicos en inglés en los diferentes tiempos verbales.
        Completa información importante en los textos, con el vocabulario, conjugaciones y gramática en inglés.
        Proporciona explicaciones, argumentos y explicaciones lógicas sobre aspectos técnicos de su profesión en un debate.
        Puede responder cuestionarios de selección múltiple, escritos en inglés.
        Puede inferir el significado de una palabra u oración dentro de un texto en inglés, así este no esté explícito.
    Duración de las actividades:
    60 Horas Acompañamiento Directo
2. INSTRUCCIONES PARA EL DILIGENCIAMIENTO
Estimado Aprendiz: le sugiero tener presente la información contenida en este Instrumento de Evaluación,
el cual ha sido realizado para recoger, verificar y valorar sus conocimientos de la actividad de
Aprendizaje: RISK AT WORK
Lea cuidadosamente cada una de las preguntas y responda de manera clara, concisa, precisa y
preséntelas a su Facilitador (a).
Usted debe:
       Analizar tranquilamente cada pregunta
       Solicitar explicación sobre aquellas palabras o expresiones que le generen dudas.
       Valoración: Esta prueba se considera aprobada si contesta acertadamente todas las preguntas
        planteadas
3. FORMULACION DE PREGUNTAS
Learning new meanings:
Review the following meanings and match the words with the appropriate concept related to some
Osha list of Hazards and description.
    Excavation (Collapse)                        A chemical that exposes a person by absorption
                                                 through the skin, inhalation, or through the
                                                 bloodstream that causes illness, disease, or
                                                 death. The amount of chemical exposure is
                                                 critical in determining hazardous effects. Check
                                                 Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS), and/or
                                                 OSHA        1910.1000     for   chemical      hazard
                                                 information.
    Electrical (Shock/Short Circuit)             Contact with exposed conductors or a device that
                                                 is incorrectly or inadvertently grounded, such as
                                                 when a metal ladder comes into contact with
                                                 power lines. 60Hz alternating current (common
                                                 house current) is very dangerous because it can
                                                 stop the heart.
    Chemical (Toxic)                             Soil collapse in a trench or excavation as a result
                                                 of improper or inadequate shoring. Soil type is
                                                 critical in determining the hazard likelihood
    Ergonomics (Human Error)                     A chemical that, when exposed to a heat ignition
                                                 source, results in combustion. Typically, the
                                                 lower a chemical's flash point and boiling point,
                                                 the more flammable the chemical. Check MSDS
                                                 for flammability information.
    Explosion (Over Pressurization)              Use of electrical power that results in electrical
                                                 overheating or arcing to the point of combustion
                                                 or ignition of flammables, or electrical component
                                                 damage..
                                                 A system design, procedure, or equipment that is
                                                 error-provocative. A switch goes up to turn
    Ergonomics (Strain)                          something off.
    Explosion (Chemical Reaction)                Damage of tissue due to over exertion (strains
                                                 and sprains) or repetitive motion.
    Electrical (Fire)                            A chemical that, when it comes into contact with
                                                 skin, metal, or other materials, damages the
                                                 materials. Acids and bases are examples of
                                                 corrosives
                                                 The moving or rubbing of wool, nylon, other
                                                 synthetic fibers, and even flowing liquids can
    Electrical (Loss of Power)                   generate static electricity. This creates an excess
                                                 or deficiency of electrons on the surface of
                                                 material that discharges (spark) to the ground
                                                 resulting in the ignition of flammables or damage
                                                 to electronics or the body's nervous system.
                                       Chemical       Self-explanatory.
    (Corrosive)
    Electrical (Static/ESD)                           Safety-critical equipment failure as a result of
                                                      loss of power.
    Chemical (Flammable)                              Sudden and violent release of a large amount of
                                                      gas/energy due to a significant pressure
                                                      difference such as rupture in a boiler or
                                                      compressed gas cylinder.
   3.1 Reading about Risks at your workshop:
Now review What risks do you take? conversation, read through it closely and answer the
questions taking into account the reading.
                                       What risks do you take?
Scene: A student bar.
Four first year students are gathered around a table. They have only just started college and are
trying to get to know one another. Jack is studying Physics and thinks he knows it all. He met Heidi
(who is studying Media Studies) when she turned up at Climbing Club to see what it was like. Jack
reckons he is a pretty good climber and so offered to ‘show Heidi the ropes’. Laila is a mathematician
and the final member of the group is Liam, a mechanical engineer whose only interests seem to be
powerful bikes and war gaming. Perhaps surprisingly, Liam has asked Laila out three times so far –
Laila has unsurprisingly refused on each occasion.
-Jack: So, at the top of the climb we just sat down, took off the climbing gear and had a smoke.
-Heidi: (sarcastically) You must have looked cool.
-Jack: Certainly did, and when we got back down we had a few drinks in the bar – can’t remember
much of the next day.
-Laila: Aren’t you worried about the damage to your health of all that smoking and drinking?
-Jack: Who are you, my mum? Look, the risk in climbing is much bigger than anything else so I may
as well smoke or drink as much as I like. I suppose you’re also going to tell me that the rock face I
climbed was only ten miles from Sella field so I might get irradiated.
-Laila: You were getting irradiated at a small level – it is just whether you think the risk is worth it.
-Jack: Look, the Chernobyl accident will only cause fifty or so deaths in Britain over the next few
decades. The risk due to nuclear power is tiny.
-Liam: I know all about risk – I have to calculate it all the time in gaming.
-Heidi: (sarcastically) Yeah, just how risky is fighting an orc armed with a scimitar?
-Liam: Very funny. For your information, my orcs don’t use scimitars, they use straight blades.
-Laila: What about your bike? Riding one of those things is dangerous.
-Liam: I live life on the edge – why don’t you come to the edge with me one day, Laila?
-Laila: I don’t think I had better – the ‘risk’ of me jumping off to get away from you would be too great.
-Jack: You are more at risk from death by an asteroid than from death in a plane.
-Liam: Yeah, you’re going to tell me that breathing is dangerous.
-Heidi: Well it is if you are breathing in radon, which we all are to a greater or lesser extent. The
concentration is rather greater in Cornwall. Radon kills.
-Jack: No it doesn’t – radon is a gas, breathe it in and you breathe it out. The danger comes from the
                                           daughter products, which are solids.
-Heidi: Mobile phones are meant to be risky too. That’s because they work by radiation. Just like
nuclear bombs.
-Laila: I don’t think that is quite right, Heidi.
-Jack: Another drink anyone? It is your round Liam.
-Laila: And drinking, of course, dead risky.
-Heidi: And power lines
-Laila: And road travel, air travel and rail travel. All risky.
-Jack: As I say, if you’re a climber the other risks are much less and just don’t matter.
-Liam: I’ll get the drinks.
Answer the next questions:
     1. Lists the risks mentioned in the dialogue. Divide these into voluntary risks and involuntary
   risks.
     R/ voluntary
          Smoke
          Drink
          Radon gas
     Involuntary
          Accident
          nuclear risk
       2. Put the voluntary risks in order of your opinion of increasing risk.
    R/
             drink
             smoke
             radon gas
          My opinion about the increasing risk is that this is about the growth of some situation or
          disease.
       3. Now use your book or websites to attempt to produce an objective list of increasing risks.
       Why is this difficult?
       R/
        The fast development of the entails the growing risk of the disparity that  could appear among different
         regions in.
        There is also a growing risk that certain countries may impose unilateral measures regarding
         carbon content on their international trade flows.
        Populations at increased risk include individuals with  weakened immune systems, recent
         trauma, or diabetes.
        reduced judicial activity at a time where there is an increased risk of disputes in terms  of civil
         law, owing to the extreme weakness
    4. Why does Jack show a poor understanding of risk when he says:
    “Look, the risk in climbing is much bigger than anything else so I may as well smoke or drink as
   much as I like.”
     R/ Jack shows that poor understanding because he thinks that the greatest risk he can take is
   climbing because he thinks that an accident could happen to him while if he drinks and smokes
                                       nothing will happen to him not knowing that it is wrong
   because drinks and cigarettes are more bad for the health
    5. Why is Heidi confused when she equates mobile phones with radioactivity?
    R/ Heidy is confused because he is not very clear about the topic he is talking about, so he
   makes the comparison between phones and nuclear bombs.
    6. Why might Jack say that: “you are more at risk from death by an asteroid than from death in a
   plane”?
    R/ Jack could say that because he thinks an airplane would be safer than an asteroid.
    7. How would you try to persuade people that nuclear power is relatively risk-free?
     R/ I would try to persuade people that nuclear energy is relatively risk-free by showing them
   studies by experts in the field to provide more assurance that it does not present any type of risk.
    8. How would you try to persuade people that nuclear power is an unacceptable risk?
     R/ It would try to persuade people that nuclear energy is an unacceptable risk, evidencing
   studies by experts on the subject to realize that nuclear energy is bad because it could have
   harmful effects on people's health.
  3.2 Complete the information required:
Review the pictures and complete the next chart:
               if it could      the strategy that
               cause a          can be used
  locative                      would be order
               danger from
               the collapse     and cleanliness
               of the boxes
               if this danger   the strategy that
               could harm       could be used
 security
               the person as    would be to have
conditions
               it would cause   a labeled bin that
               cuts due to      will only be for
               broken glass     glass so we could
                                avoid these
                                accidents
               if this danger   The strategy I
               could harm a     would use would
 Locative
               if this danger   The strategy I
               can harm a       would use
 Locative
               person, since    would be to use
 fall to the   it can trip      a machine so
same level     and cause an     that the person
               injury           carrying the box
                                can see where
                                he is walking to
                                avoid tripping.
4. EVALUACIÓN:
Ciudad y Fecha:   Firmas:
                  Instructor: LINA MARCELA CAMARGO RUIZ
                  Aprendiz: MAYRA GABRIELA PLAZAS LOPEZ