Iryna Lystopad
I'm passionate about medieval thought. It is so different from ours that it teaches us to be tolerant to any way of thinking.
Currently, I'm working on logical aspect of XII century platonisme. notions, ideas, forms, semantics... just ask me more about :)
Supervisors: Andriy Vasylchenko and Dominique Poirel
Currently, I'm working on logical aspect of XII century platonisme. notions, ideas, forms, semantics... just ask me more about :)
Supervisors: Andriy Vasylchenko and Dominique Poirel
less
Uploads
see: https://trarborescentes.sciencesconf.org/resource/page/id/23
J’ai l'honneur de vous convier à mon intervention au séminaire de Nicolas Weill-Parot à l'Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes "Histoire des sciences dans l'Occident médiéval",
Intitulée :
"Le statut des êtres individuels dans la philosophie des victorins : Hugues et Achard"
D’après ma thèse de doctorat, soutenu le 17 décembre 2016
Le séminaire se déroulera le 30 mai de 18h à 20h,
dans des locaux de l'EPHE à la Sorbonne, 45-47 rue des Ecoles 75005 Paris, escalier E, 1er étage à droite, salle D059
L’intervention aura lieu durant la deuxième partie de la séance
ATTENTION : pour des raisons de sécurité, il faut présenter à l'entrée de la Sorbonne une carte professionnelle, une carte d'étudiant, une carte de bibliothèque ou un autre justificatif.
In the first part of the thesis, I introduce Achard’s philosophy and the paleographical and philological problems posed by the only manuscript of the De unitate. Then I consider the elements of the treatise (questions, doctrines, notions) which were borrowed from Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism.
The two other parts are dedicated to the examination of the possibility of a plurality in God (persons and reasons in the Word of God) and in the world (as it is conceived by God through form-prototypes). In each part, I examine the way that main thinkers of Late Antiquity and High Middle Ages (Apuleius, Augustin, Chalcidius, Boethius, Erigena) and the Victorins (Hugues and Richard) absorbed the platonic doctrines described in the first part of my dissertation. At the end of each part, I propose the reconstruction of Achard’s development of those doctrines.
This dissertation contributes to two problems of the history of philosophy: what Platonic doctrines and sources were received in the XIIth century and what is the place of the Platonic heritage in Victorin thought. The philosophical problems of the multiplication of intelligible and sensible objects, of the definition of things and of the identity of beings are also addressed.
In the first part of the thesis, I introduce Achard’s philosophy and the paleographical and philological problems posed by the only manuscript of the De unitate. Then I consider the elements of the treatise (questions, doctrines, notions) which were borrowed from Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism.
The two other parts are dedicated to the examination of the possibility of a plurality in God (persons and reasons in the Word of God) and in the world (as it is conceived by God through form-prototypes). In each part, I examine the way that main thinkers of Late Antiquity and High Middle Ages (Apuleius, Augustin, Chalcidius, Boethius, Erigena) and the Victorins (Hugues and Richard) absorbed the platonic doctrines described in the first part of my dissertation. At the end of each part, I propose the reconstruction of Achard’s development of those doctrines.
This dissertation contributes to two problems of the history of philosophy: what Platonic doctrines and sources were received in the XIIth century and what is the place of the Platonic heritage in Victorin thought. The philosophical problems of the multiplication of intelligible and sensible objects, of the definition of things and of the identity of beings are also addressed.
see: https://trarborescentes.sciencesconf.org/resource/page/id/23
J’ai l'honneur de vous convier à mon intervention au séminaire de Nicolas Weill-Parot à l'Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes "Histoire des sciences dans l'Occident médiéval",
Intitulée :
"Le statut des êtres individuels dans la philosophie des victorins : Hugues et Achard"
D’après ma thèse de doctorat, soutenu le 17 décembre 2016
Le séminaire se déroulera le 30 mai de 18h à 20h,
dans des locaux de l'EPHE à la Sorbonne, 45-47 rue des Ecoles 75005 Paris, escalier E, 1er étage à droite, salle D059
L’intervention aura lieu durant la deuxième partie de la séance
ATTENTION : pour des raisons de sécurité, il faut présenter à l'entrée de la Sorbonne une carte professionnelle, une carte d'étudiant, une carte de bibliothèque ou un autre justificatif.
In the first part of the thesis, I introduce Achard’s philosophy and the paleographical and philological problems posed by the only manuscript of the De unitate. Then I consider the elements of the treatise (questions, doctrines, notions) which were borrowed from Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism.
The two other parts are dedicated to the examination of the possibility of a plurality in God (persons and reasons in the Word of God) and in the world (as it is conceived by God through form-prototypes). In each part, I examine the way that main thinkers of Late Antiquity and High Middle Ages (Apuleius, Augustin, Chalcidius, Boethius, Erigena) and the Victorins (Hugues and Richard) absorbed the platonic doctrines described in the first part of my dissertation. At the end of each part, I propose the reconstruction of Achard’s development of those doctrines.
This dissertation contributes to two problems of the history of philosophy: what Platonic doctrines and sources were received in the XIIth century and what is the place of the Platonic heritage in Victorin thought. The philosophical problems of the multiplication of intelligible and sensible objects, of the definition of things and of the identity of beings are also addressed.
In the first part of the thesis, I introduce Achard’s philosophy and the paleographical and philological problems posed by the only manuscript of the De unitate. Then I consider the elements of the treatise (questions, doctrines, notions) which were borrowed from Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism.
The two other parts are dedicated to the examination of the possibility of a plurality in God (persons and reasons in the Word of God) and in the world (as it is conceived by God through form-prototypes). In each part, I examine the way that main thinkers of Late Antiquity and High Middle Ages (Apuleius, Augustin, Chalcidius, Boethius, Erigena) and the Victorins (Hugues and Richard) absorbed the platonic doctrines described in the first part of my dissertation. At the end of each part, I propose the reconstruction of Achard’s development of those doctrines.
This dissertation contributes to two problems of the history of philosophy: what Platonic doctrines and sources were received in the XIIth century and what is the place of the Platonic heritage in Victorin thought. The philosophical problems of the multiplication of intelligible and sensible objects, of the definition of things and of the identity of beings are also addressed.