[go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

User talk:Teblick/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 9

Talkback

Hello, Teblick. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
Message added 14:42, 12 January 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:42, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Ziv Company

I'll get to your message on my talk page in a little bit, but wanted to point out a minor error in the article you're writing in your sandbox. Under the "Concept" section it states "programs recorded on acetate discs and offered to local advertisers in each radio market". This isn't wholly accurate. First, "acetate" is an incorrect term. There are "acetate" discs, but they are VERY uncommon. The term you are looking for is "lacquer". However, even this isn't accurate. Most Ziv transcriptions are pressed in vinyl, and aren't individually-cut lacquer discs. For one thing, not only was pressing vinyl more cost-efficient, vinyl is considerably lighter (think less postage costs) than aluminum-based lacquer discs, and vinyl was less prone to damage. Hope that helps. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

OK, they probably were recorded on "lacquer discs" (most records were) but they were not usually distributed to the stations that way. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 20

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs)

  • Partner resource expansions
  • New search tool for finding TWL resources
  • #1lib1ref 2017
  • Wikidata Visiting Scholar

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer granted

Hello Teblick. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog (around 15,000 pages) down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 10

This month, we discuss the new CollaborationKit extension. Here's an image as a teaser:

23:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi Eddie. Thanks for the tip about refs on John Shelton (actor). I added comments on the Talk page and put in some contemporary references. That was hard genealogical research!! As soon as you mentioned it, I was initially convinced that combining all the various current references to marriages was a big mistake. One which I would not do in my genealogy research. However, I have worked with oral history and decided to assume that some sort of documentation could be found for all five. That was fun. Hope you will accept the Hedda Hopper reference :) I left the reference template at the top, you can remove it if you think it meets the criterion. Thanks again for the tone of your comment. Rcollman (talk) 17:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Tip of the day monitoring

Hi.

I noticed your comments over at the TOTD department, giving us a heads up on some tips, and it looks like you are a fan of the tips and read them fairly often.

So I was wondering if you would be willing to read the tip a day in advance, to provide an early warning for problems in tips about to go live.

In case you are interested, there is the template {{totd-tomorrow}}, which displays the upcoming tip for tomorrow.

You can place it anywhere on your user pages you want. On my talk page, I include the current tip and tomorrow's tip as a footnote at the bottom of the page, by inserting this this code anywhere on the page:

<ref>{{totd}}</br>{{right|{{today cell}}{{spaces|5}}}}{{totd-tomorrow}}</ref>

This floats the tips below all messages. Where they catch my attention everytime I check for messages.

Like this.[1]

To remove them from the bottom of your page, remove the line with reference, directly above.

I hope you find this tip to your liking.

Have fun.

Sincerely, The Transhumanist 07:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you for the feedback on Assumption College Greyhounds. I will use your advice to make the article better. If you don't mind could you please check the other articles that I have created to see if there are any mistakes. The articles that I have made are Cedarville University Yellow Jackets, Cheyney University Wolves, Daemen College Wildcats, and King University Tornados. If you need to you can contact me on my talk page. Again thank you for the feedback and I would appreciate it if you could read my other articles. —Preceding undated comment added 00:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

I have read the pages, and here are my thoughts.
  • King University Tornados: Avoid just copying content (as you noted at the end of each paragraph). If you must used the wording of another source, enclose it in quotation marks and use standard Wikipedia citations to refer to the book, web page, or whatever it came from. Unless you need exact wording, however, it's better to paraphrase (but you still need a citation).
  • Daemen College Wildcats: Spell out the name of the conference rather than using ECC. Many people will not know what the abbreviation stands for. If you refer to the conference later, the abbreviation will be all right. Also, you need to have sources on this one, and add more details to the text.
  • Cedarville University Yellow Jackets: The lead contains a typographical error ("mempership"). Spell out "National Christian College Athletic Association" the first time you use it. I first thought that "NCCAA" was a typographical error of the better-known NCAA; I assume that many other readers would think the same thing. And spell out the organization that AMC stands for when you first refer to it.
  • Cheney University Wolves: Spell out what "PSAC" stands for the first time you refer to it. In the "Basketball" section, explain how this Division II school participated in the Division I tournament. Reference 2 uses a Wikipedia page, which is prohibited. That will leave you with one reference, which is not good. Look for additional independent, reliable sources for the information in your article. Also, use a "cite" template to revise the first reference. Plain URL addresses should not be used.
I'm sure I haven't covered everything, but I have delayed longer than I should have in replying to your request. I hope that these comments are helpful. Eddie Blick (talk) 23:53, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Hey...

I've been doing some long overdue maintenance to the WP:UPDC, and have rewritten its tips page.

Since you enjoy tips, I was wondering if you would be willing to proofread that page to see if it is a useful guide to newbies wishing to make a nice user page.

Cheerio, The Transhumanist 06:34, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

@The Transhumanist:Sure! I'll be glad to do that. I'll get back in touch with you after I look it over. Eddie Blick (talk) 13:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your deletion request for 2017 in Dominica.

Hello, I was wanting to alert you about the deletion request you put on one of my pages. I have added some content so that it will fit the requirements. (Cass)

I don't know how to reply to you directly. When you leave a message for someone, you should end it with four tildes, which will automatically provide your user name and a link to your talk page. As for the deletion nomination, once an article is proposed for deletion, the decision is made by others -- not by the one who proposed it. They will look at the article (including whatever changes you made) and decide whether to delete it. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:45, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Black Museum 2015 edit- production

Hi there. Back in 2015 you removed the original source for The Black Museum and inserted a "produced by the BBC" line without quoting a source. Unfortunately there are many incorrect citations for this and other programs produced by Harry Towers, many of them alas American - the program was first broadcast in the USA. Helpfully the BBC have made available online a database of all of their radio programs up to about 1995. This indicates that they did not broadcast The Black Museum until 1991. The BBC Charter set them up as a none-commercial radio station, and in the 1950s their productions were for broadcast for themselves - not purely for resale. In more recent years we have had a standalone associated commercial company BBC Worldwide. In Europe The Black Box was broadcast on Radio Luxembourg.

Unfortunately although you were undoubtedly using a source you considered reliable, in no way could it be correct. The BBC simply could not do that then. The original text you removed was correct in saying that the program was incorrectly cited in some sources as a BBC program.

His Guardian obituary states Towers was born in London. While serving in the RAF during the second world war, he wrote many radio plays under the name Peter Welbeck, a pseudonym he used from time to time as a scriptwriter throughout his career. In 1946 he and his mother, Margaret Miller Towers, started a company called Towers of London that sold various syndicated radio shows around the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.97.48.225 (talk) 11:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Tripartite_Indenture_of_1856 deletion

Hi! Thanks for notifying me of the mark for deletion. I've added some additional context with a citation, on why I feel that this is an important historical event. I'd appreciate your feedback on whether you think it's sufficient. Nemilar (talk) 17:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

George Jacobs, Jr.

I redirected this to George_Jacobs_(Salem_witch_trials). Bearian (talk) 15:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 21

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 21, January-March 2017
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • #1lib1ref 2017
  • Wikipedia Library User Group
  • Wikipedia + Libraries at Wikimedia Conference 2017
  • Spotlight: Library Card Platform

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Court of Missing Heirs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter Kinsella. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Invitation

Invitation to the Tip of the day WikiProject

Hello Teblick,
You are invited to join the Tip of the day, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to providing useful daily advice on how to use or develop Wikipedia more effectively.
To join the project, just add your name to the participants list. We're so glad you're here!
                      –


Since you are active with totd, I was wondering if you would like to add your name to the participants list. The Transhumanist 06:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited June Travis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stranded. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello Teblick,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 803 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Something for you ;)

File:Wendy Warren and the News 1948.jpg :-) We hope (talk) 01:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

And you're so welcome, there's another one, :-D File:Jack Smith Show 1948.jpg We hope (talk) 01:48, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Still more. ;) File:Bride and Groom 1948.jpg We hope (talk) 02:18, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 22

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017

  • New and expanded research accounts
  • Global branches update
  • Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
  • Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Teblick, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

New edit interface

Here is the discussion.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:21, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

References

  1. ^
    Permission requests

    Many editors often wonder how to request permission to use an image they found somewhere, or a section of text from another source. Try using one of the permission request templates created specifically for this purpose so that you do not have to fuss with all the details.

    Read more:
    Become a Wikipedia tipster
    To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

         
    Please proofread the daily tip...

    It's displayed below one day early.

    Some tips are obsolete. So we need new tips too. Please share your best tips and tip ideas at the Tip of the day department.

    edit Tomorrow's tip of the day...

    Lead Section Size

    The lead section of a Wikipedia article is the section before the first heading. The table of contents, if displayed, generally appears between the lead section and the first subheading.

    Rule of thumb: If a topic deserves a heading or subheading, then it deserves short mention in the lead.

    The lead section should contain up to four paragraphs, depending on the length of the article, and should provide a preview of the main points the article will make, summarizing the primary reasons the subject matter is interesting or notable. The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, should be written in a clear and accessible style, should be carefully sourced like the rest of the text, and should encourage the reader to want to read more. The following table has some general guidelines for the length of the lead section:

    < 15,000 characters medium size > 30,000 characters
    one or two paragraphs   two or three paragraphs   three or four paragraphs
    Summary essay:
    Read more:
    Become a Wikipedia tipster
    To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd-tomorrow}}

Books and Bytes - Issue 23

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017

  • Library card
  • User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
  • Bytes in brief

Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Teblick, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

  • Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
  • Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Teblick, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

  • On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
  • Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Chicago Tribune archive

Just thought I'd let you know that the free archive is gone. The link we have to it now forwards to Newspapers.com. The Tribune has apparently turned all of this over to them. You're able to buy a "Chicago Tribune" only subscription from them and if you have a Newspapers.com subscription, the Tribune is included in that. I stumbled on this last night when I clicked one of the older (free) links. The bad thing is that all ref links made when the archive was free don't work. I'll be trying to find all articles where I've used the free links over about 2 years and replace them with clippings from Newspapers.com. This happened in the last couple of months or so as I see the free links were working in August. We hope (talk) 13:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

@We hope:I stumbled across that change last night, too. I was doing a search on Google for sources for a possible article and, like you, clicking on a Chicago Tribune link led me to their part of the Newspapers.com site. I was sorry to see that, but I suppose it was inevitable. I remember that soon after I discovered the free Tribune search feature someone (possibly you) commented that it probably would eventually convert to a paid service. I wish I had learned about archiving pages earlier. Now when I use a newspaper site like The New York Times or The Washington Post for a source, I create a copy at the Internet Archive or a similar site. Thanks for writing; it's good to hear from you. Eddie Blick (talk) 14:14, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
The site made it clear that at some point, they would begin charging for access from my first visit on. But they never said when that might be or how much they would charge for it. I think the Tribune decided that turning it all over to a newspaper archiving company would mean less work for them. BTW, if the site allows crawlers and you get "caught short", you can try to see if the Wayback Machine crawled the page previously. Try entering the URL in the top search box at Wayback Machine; more often than not I can find a link like that.
Still waiting for someone to put the 2 major Milwaukee newspapers back online. They disappeared from Google News over a year ago. Did some research and learned there's apparently a legal issue. The Milwaukee Public Library helped an archiving service with copies of the paper the archive service didn't have. When they were complete, the library was asked to buy access to the newspaper databases they helped create. The same thing happened with two of the Palm Beach newspapers, but I was able to find they'd moved to Newspapers.com. We hope (talk) 14:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
@We hope: That's a strange legal twist about the Milwaukee newspapers. I hadn't heard about that. I'm still waiting for access to the Publisher Extra newspapers with my Newspapers.com account through Wikipedia. I read that we are supposed to be getting that, but I don't know when it will take effect. Eddie Blick (talk) 15:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
I'd ask about it because I have the Publishers Extra on my account and it's just great! It includes the Chicago Tribune so what I'm able to do now is search for the missing news articles and fix the links to them. We hope (talk) 15:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
@We hope: Do you know where or whom I should ask? I posted a question about it weeks ago in the discussion where the announcement about getting access to Extra appeared. I asked something to the effect of whether I needed to do anything to get access. Should I post another question in that discussion? Eddie Blick (talk) 15:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Why not leave a note at Cameron11598's talk page? According to this those with subscriptions would get an e-mail asking if you'd like the upgrade. I didn't because it was around this time my subscription was up for renewal-new/renewed accounts automatically are for "full" subscriptions. Mine was just there when I logged on one day after the renewal. We hope (talk) 15:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
@We hope: Thanks for the suggestion. I'll do that. I appreciate your help. Eddie Blick (talk) 16:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 24

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017

  • User Group update
  • Global branches update
    • Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
  • Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
  • Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
  • Bytes in brief

Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Teblick, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

  • Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

J g ballard

Radio episodes not mentioned.See talk Jakescows (talk) 16:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Teblick. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Teblick, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
  • Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

  • If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

  • A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
  • Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
  • The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 25

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017

  • OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
  • User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
  • Bytes in brief

Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello Teblick, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

  • The total number of reviews completed for the month.
  • The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 9
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Teblick/Archive_3&oldid=1192751154"