Talk:UFT One
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I believe QTP is a replacement for WinRunner and they are not supposed to work togeather. Netrat_msk (talk) 17:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Coverages
[edit]Customer's Requirements are validated in terms of Coverages. They are as follows:
1. Behavioral Coverage 2. Input Domain Coverage 3. Error Handling Coverage 4. Calculation Coverage 5. Back-End Coverage 6. Service Level Coverage
Those above coverages are common for any applications and we have two additional coverages which are determined for Web Applications.
7. Links Coverage 8. Static Text Coverage —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vamsijj (talk • contribs) 07:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Non-UI testing
[edit]this looks a very good article. I've a particular interest in how QTP might be used to test business logic directly (ie, making the business logic tests independent of the UI, so that these tests can be run regardless of UI changes). The article makes very brief mention of 'non-UI' testing and 'API certification testing'. I don't know what's meant by 'certification testing', and suggest this either be explained, or replaced by a more common term. I've Googled certification testing, but no joy, so I don't think this is a commonly known term. Articles should try to use terminology that is commonly used in the 'trade', or if there isn't a commonly used term for something, any terms that are used for that thing need to be explained. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.24.12 (talk) 13:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Advertisement??
[edit]one more thing to in addition to my 'non-UI testing' section: I note this article has been tagged as reading like an ad. God knows why. I don't think it reads like an ad at all. It just describes features and functions of the product; it doesn't try to extol its virtues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.24.12 (talk) 13:26, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Reeling off a list of feature *is* what advertisements *are*. 208.84.105.60 (talk) 15:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Remote Desktop Protocol issues?
[edit]I'm not aware of any serious licensing issues with QTP and Remote Desktop. I haven't used it in awhile, but 9.2 worked fine when QTP and the AUT were on the same machine. When trying to use QTP across the Citrix protocol, which is what I have heard Windows Remote Desktop uses, it naturally doesn't recognize any objects - because Citrix doesn't send objects, it just sends images and coordinates. Of course, all of the above is original research. — Ken g6 (talk) 03:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
If you mean using QTP on a remote machine accessed via Windows Remote Desktop, I've also had no problems with this. My company only has one license for QTP so we installed it on a PC in our server room and share it. Have had no issues running it so far over 6 months. AntJ103 (talk) 13:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Massive rewrite, researched and outside references added throughout article
[edit]Thoroughly researched, revised and added sources throughout this article. Removed the notice of lack of outside references as a result. I welcome any further edits to improve the article. JLRedperson (talk) 01:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted product?
[edit]Looks like you can't get QuickTest Pro from HP any more. There are still some links on the site, but the lead to other products.203.206.162.148 (talk) 10:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
No I don't think that's true. It appears HP are rebranding it with a much more HP-ish name of "HP Functional Test". Also note that if you purchase "Unified Functional Testing" from HP you are getting a bundle of QTP 11 ("HP Functional Test") and Service Test 11[1]. AntJ103 (talk) 13:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
References
- ^ Colantonio, Joe. "WTF is UFT? HP's Unified Functional Testing". joecolantonio.com. joecolantonio.com. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
Name change
[edit]Based on the above, it looks like (at some point) the name of this article may need to be changed to "HP Functional Test". For now though, I have simply added an internal link to this article from the short "HP Unified Functional Testing" heading in the HP Application Lifecycle Management article and created a redirect to it from the actual "HP Unified Functional Testing" page which I just created. AntJ103 (talk) 13:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Supporting non-IE browsers
[edit]"QuickTest Professional (QTP) cannot test with all browser types and versions. In particular it does not support Safari, Firefox, or Opera."
In fact, As of July 2013, QTP 11/11.5 supports up to IE9, Netscape 9, AOL 9, Firefox 19 and Chrome 42, although in some cases this support may be at run-time only. See the (always updated) product support document at http://support.openview.hp.com/selfsolve/document/KM1210389/binary/QTP11.00_PAM.pdf?searchIdentifier=&resultType=document (requires log-in I think).
Product name change
[edit]It appears the product is now known as HP Unified Functional Testing (UFT): http://www8.hp.com/us/en/software-solutions/software.html?compURI=1172957#.Uh56Tz8VEyY Is there a press release for this change? We should definitely move the article to the new name and update the article to reflect the change with a history of the name included. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:42, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on HP QuickTest Professional. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101221192636/http://testingfaqs.org/t-gui.html to http://www.testingfaqs.org/t-gui.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Sold to Micro Focus
[edit]I just have added into the text that the whole HPE Software division was sold to Micro Focus, but the article needs some review according to this. HP should be somehow eliminated to the past. --DeeMusil (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)