User:Pjacobi

Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.

All rights released to all minor edits
I agree to release all rights, unless otherwise stated, to all my English Wikipedia text contributions marked as minor edits, enabling anyone to use them for any purpose. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to freely use my minor edit contributions, please check the multi-licensing guide.

The Manifesto of the Red Faction - Wik

THEY (you have been warned)

Six meta-boxes at the top of an article: [1]
Funny argument: [2]
Newbies arguing in article space: [3] [4]
The French government takes action: [5]

Yes, there is a cabal on Wikipedia. It is very large. Given the nature of Wikipedia, it is an uncommonly open cabal, including many people who disagree on most matters, and collectively it has no political agenda, just a process-oriented one. If you are a Wikipedia contributor who complies with Wikipedia:Don't be a dick you are, perhaps unbeknownst even to yourself, a member of the cabal. As for those who are certain that they are outside the cabal and are convinced that the cabal is opposed to them, you may draw your own conclusions. - Jmabel at the Village Pump

Peter Jacobi

Hamburg, Germany

m:User:Pjacobi

commons:User:Pjacobi

“Eternity is a very long time, especially toward the end” – Anon.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias

User:Pjacobi/Scratchpad … User:Pjacobi/Random … User:Pjacobi/Character set tables … User:Pjacobi/Constructed Languages (minor) … User:Pjacobi/OMFG … User:Pjacobi/LQP … User:Pjacobi/Disputes … User:Pjacobi/temp

Jerry Bona once said: The Axiom of Choice is obviously true, the well-ordering principle obviously false, and who can tell about Zorn's Lemma?

Wikipedia:Utilities

If the black holes are produced by the LHC and Hawking is wrong - they don't radiate - we will see their existence for a while, but very easily, because such a black hole will eat Switzerland and then the rest of our blue planet
Lubos Motl in sci.physics.strings

Fortunately, as was pointed out in followup messages, black holes the size Large Hadron Collider may be able to produce, would need a lot of time to eat the earth.

This user is a member of the

Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.