[go: up one dir, main page]
Wikipedia

Crystal River Nuclear Plant

(Redirected from Crystal River 3 Nuclear Power Plant)

The Crystal River Nuclear Plant also called the Crystal River 3 Nuclear Power Plant, or simply CR-3, is a closed nuclear power plant located in Crystal River, Florida. As of 2013 the facility is being decommissioned, a process expected to last 60 years.[2][3] The power plant was completed and licensed to operate in December 1976, and operated safely for 33 years until shutdown in September 2009. It was the third plant built as part of the 4,700-acre (1,900 ha) Crystal River Energy Complex (CREC) which contains a single nuclear power plant, while sharing the site with four operational fossil fuel power plants.

Crystal River Nuclear Plant
Aerial of Crystal River Nuclear Plant
Map
Official nameCrystal River Nuclear Plant
CountryUnited States
LocationCrystal River, Florida
Coordinates28°57.45′N 82°41.90′W / 28.95750°N 82.69833°W / 28.95750; -82.69833
StatusBeing decommissioned
Construction beganSeptember 25, 1968 (1968-09-25)
Commission dateMarch 13, 1977 (1977-03-13)
Decommission date–
Construction cost$1.436 billion (2007)[1]
OwnerDuke Energy
Nuclear power station
Reactor typePWR
Reactor supplierBabcock & Wilcox
Thermal capacity2568
Power generation
Nameplate capacity860 MW
Capacity factor66.4%
External links
Websitewww.duke-energy.com/our-company/about-us/power-plants/crystal-river
[edit on Wikidata]

The Crystal River reactor went offline in September 2009 for refueling, OTSG replacement (once through steam generator), and 20% power up-rate outage. In preparing the containment building for making the opening to replace the two OTSG's, tendons in the containment building wall were detensioned. During the concrete removal in creating the opening workers discovered a large gap in the concrete of the containment building wall. The main cause of the gap, which further engineering analysis determined was a large delamination, was attributed to the scope and sequence of the tendon detensioning.[4] The plant had originally been scheduled to restart in April 2011, but the project encountered a number of delays.[5] Repairs were successful, but additional delamination began to occur in adjacent bays. After several months of analyzing options, Duke Energy senior executives announced in February 2013 that the Crystal River Nuclear Plant would be permanently shut down.[6] The costs were estimated at $1.18 billion over the next 60 years of decommissioning.[7]

The coal-fired units are not affected.[8]

Crystal River was originally owned by Florida Progress Corporation (and operated by its subsidiary, Florida Power Corporation) but, in 2000, it was bought by Carolina Power & Light to form the new company, Progress Energy. Progress Energy owned 91.8% of the plant; the remainder is owned by nine municipal utilities. Effective July 2, 2012, Duke Energy purchased Progress Energy and made it a wholly owned direct unit of Duke Energy.[9]

Power plant and containment

edit

Crystal River 3 Nuclear Power Plant was an operating 860 MWe, PWR (pressurized water reactor plant). There are three main barriers that protect the public from the radiation hazards associated with nuclear operations. One of those barriers is known as the containment building which houses the fuel, the reactor, and the reactor cooling system. The Crystal River containment building is a steel lined post-tensioned (prestressed concrete) cylindrical concrete structure approximately 157 feet (48 m) in height with an outside diameter of about 138 feet (42 m). The containment has 42-inch thick concrete walls, has a flat foundation mat and a shallow torispherical dome. Post-tensioning is achieved by utilizing an outer array of horizontal tendons immediately adjacent to an inner array of vertical tendons that are embedded in the walls about 15 inches from the outside surface.

Refueling outage, containment repairs and closure

edit

CR-3 went offline in September 2009 for RFO-16. While the reactor was down, the old steam generators were to be replaced. There are 426 steel tendons within the concrete walls of the reactor containment dome which reinforce the dome. Plan developer Sargent & Lundy specified that 97 tendons be loosened. Progress rejected that number as excessive. The next proposal was to loosen 74 tendons, which was typical of other nuclear plants doing the procedure. According to a Progress employee, "de-tensioning the tendons is a very expensive and time-consuming effort", so the number was further reduced to 65. Progress engaged Bechtel to provide a 3rd party review, which agreed that 65 was appropriate. However, when the work was performed, only 27 tendons were loosened, and a foreman and supervisor sent emails questioning the way the tendons were loosened.[10]

When workers began to cut the access hole for the steam generators, a crack formed. That crack was repaired, but more cracks appeared. Engineers noticed that parts of the concrete had delaminated. This was repaired, and the concrete re-tensioned, but the same problem was found in other areas. The plant had originally been due to restart in April 2011 following the uprate, but in June 2011 Progress Energy said that it did not expect it to restart until 2014. Preliminary cost estimates for the repairs was put at between $900 million and $1.3 billion,[5] but this estimate was later called into question by Duke Energy.[11] In October 2012 an independent review estimated the repair cost at $1.5 billion, with a worst-case scenario of $3.4 billion.[12] In February 2013 Duke Energy announced that Crystal River would be permanently shut down and that they will recover $850 million in insurance claims.[6] A Duke spokesperson stated, "The company sought input from numerous engineering experts — internally and externally — and used proven industry-accepted practices when determining how to replace the steam generators. Analysis has shown that the 2009 delamination (cracking) could not have been predicted. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission confirmed these findings."[10]

Gregory Jaczko, former chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, stated, "That's a multi-billion dollar asset that had to be shut down because of improper work planning, improper understanding of how to properly do this containment retrofit".[10]

Surrounding population

edit

The NRC defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles (16 km), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles (80 km), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.[13]

The 2010 U.S. population within 10 miles (16 km) of Crystal River was 20,695, an increase of 50.9 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within 50 miles (80 km) was 1,046,741, an increase of 32.4 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Ocala, (38 miles (61 km) to city center) and Spring Hill (34 miles (55 km) to city center).[14]

Seismic risk

edit

On September 10, 2006, a magnitude 5.8 earthquake occurred 300 miles southwest of the nuclear plant,[15] no damage occurred to the Crystal River Nuclear Power Plant from the rare quake. The odds of such a quake happening again in the near-term around Florida are low.[16]

The NRC's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Crystal River was 1 in 45,455, according to an NRC study published in August 2010.[17][18]

Electricity Production

edit
Generation (MWh) of Crystal River Nuclear Plant[19]
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual (Total)
2001 634,065 573,248 634,548 611,651 333,209 592,487 621,776 617,633 560,076 108,249 611,764 615,487 6,114,193
2002 631,798 571,245 631,962 608,001 594,143 605,412 622,390 622,296 605,075 629,388 543,833 634,766 7,300,309
2003 634,097 574,608 639,946 603,558 626,708 609,293 626,598 627,104 518,590 44,698 444,060 630,171 6,579,431
2004 642,042 600,830 563,406 620,121 635,435 605,340 625,326 626,628 497,578 628,796 620,363 637,445 7,303,310
2005 640,517 578,738 640,285 533,727 628,281 597,563 625,955 623,747 609,988 527,344 0 344,792 6,350,937
2006 468,911 578,318 423,584 615,711 633,455 607,045 613,749 518,624 602,771 631,644 619,006 640,912 7,353,730
2007 640,692 497,379 639,665 619,406 637,476 611,760 626,878 627,563 613,504 621,924 38,434 498,209 6,673,890
2008 630,153 607,162 209,500 628,614 607,241 619,994 638,986 539,271 623,226 648,866 629,751 617,315 6,600,079
2009 584,227 539,566 649,282 623,484 644,394 617,713 639,129 574,115 515,827 0 0 0 4,388,737
2010 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 74 0 0 34 0 128
2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ "EIA - State Nuclear Profiles". Energy Information Administration. Retrieved October 3, 2017.
  2. ^ Duke Energy (December 2, 2013). "Crystal River Unit 3 - Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report" (PDF). Pbadupws.nrc.gov. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
  3. ^ Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant. NRC, update 13 Apr 2022
  4. ^ "CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT - SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT 05000302/2009007" (PDF). Nrc.gov. October 12, 2010. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
  5. ^ a b "Progress analyzing Crystal River repair proposals". World Nuclear News. January 11, 2012.
  6. ^ a b "Crystal River Nuclear Plant to be retired; company evaluating sites for potential new gas-fueled generation". Duke-energy.com. February 5, 2013. Archived from the original on October 22, 2013. Retrieved February 5, 2013.
  7. ^ Shutting down Crystal River nuclear plant will cost $1.2 billion, take 60 years. Tampa Bay Times, 11 Dec 2013
  8. ^ "Duke Energy shuts down Crystal River nuclear plant permanently". CFN13. Archived from the original on February 8, 2013. Retrieved February 5, 2013.
  9. ^ "Duke Energy Acquires Progress Energy". Finance.yahoo.com. July 5, 2012. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
  10. ^ a b c Penn, Ivan (October 13, 2013). "Settlement likely to end inquiries into Duke Energy nuclear plant". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved October 14, 2013.
  11. ^ "Repair costs rise at Crystal River nuclear plant". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
  12. ^ "Duke to retire Crystal River nuclear plant". Nuclear Engineering International. February 5, 2013. Retrieved February 6, 2013.[permanent dead link]
  13. ^ "NRC: Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Power Plants". Archived from the original on October 2, 2006. Retrieved December 13, 2013.
  14. ^ "Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors". NBC News. April 14, 2011. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
  15. ^ "Magnitude 6.0 - GULF OF MEXICO". Archived from the original on April 1, 2016. Retrieved August 28, 2017.
  16. ^ "Florida". Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved August 28, 2017.
  17. ^ "What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk". NBC News. March 17, 2011. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
  18. ^ "Safety/Risk Assessment Results for Generic Issue 199, "Implications of Updated Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Estimates in Central and Eastern United States on Existing Plants"" (PDF). MSNBC. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 25, 2017. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
  19. ^ "Electricity Data Browser". www.eia.gov. Retrieved November 3, 2024.
edit
 
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Crystal River 3 Nuclear Generating Station.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crystal_River_Nuclear_Plant&oldid=1255200238"