Cave hyena (Crocuta (crocuta) spelaea and Crocuta (crocuta) ultima) are extinct species or subspecies of hyena known from Eurasia, which ranged from Western Europe to eastern Asia and Siberia. It is one of the best known mammals of the Ice Age and is well represented in many European bone caves. It preyed on large mammals (primarily large ungulates), and was responsible for the accumulation of hundreds of large Pleistocene mammal bones in areas including horizontal caves, sinkholes, mud pits, and muddy areas along rivers.
Cave hyena Temporal range: Middle to Late Pleistocene,
| |
---|---|
Crocuta crocuta spelaea skeleton from the Muséum de Toulouse. | |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Mammalia |
Order: | Carnivora |
Suborder: | Feliformia |
Family: | Hyaenidae |
Genus: | Crocuta |
Species: | |
Subspecies: | †C. c. spelaea
|
Trinomial name | |
†Crocuta crocuta spelaea Goldfuss, 1823
|
Often treated as subspecies or populations of the living African spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) to which they were closely related and heavily resembled, genetic evidence from the nuclear genome suggests that Eurasian Crocuta populations (including the west Eurasian Crocuta crocuta spelaea and Asian Crocuta crocuta ultima) were highly genetically divergent from African populations (having estimated to have split over 1 million years ago), though the lack of clear separation between mitochondrial genome lineages suggests that the two populations interbred for some time after the initial split.[1] Some authors have suggested that the two subspecies should be raised to species level as Crocuta spelaea and Crocuta ultima.[2]
The cause of the cave hyena's extinction is not fully understood, though it could have been due to a combination of factors, including human activity, diminished quantities of prey animals, and climate change.[3]
Description and paleoecology
editThe size of cave hyenas varied depending on environment, with populations inhabiting colder climates having a larger body size than those inhabiting more temperate climates, an example of Bergmann's rule.[4] A 2017 study estimated that on average cave hyenas weighed approximately 88 kilograms (194 lb), around 60% heavier than living spotted hyenas. In comparison to living spotted hyenas, some of the bones of the limbs are more robust (proportionally thicker and shorter), with the ulna being more curved. In the skull, the first and second upper premolars contact each other, while in living spotted hyenas these they are separated by a diastema (gap),[5] though collectively the differences between the skeletal anatomy of cave hyenas and living spotted hyenas are "relatively minor".[6] The endocast (brain cavity) also shows differences between from that of the spotted hyena, with the living spotted hyena having a better developed front part of the brain, which may suggest differences in behaviour.[6] Evidence from cave art suggests that cave hyenas had a similar physical appearance to living spotted hyenas.[7]
Diet
editThe diet of the cave hyena is thought to have primarily consisted of large ungulates like wild horse, aurochs, steppe bison, Irish elk/giant deer, wild boar, red deer and reindeer, with larger herbivores like the woolly rhinoceros and woolly mammoth probably being scavenged after death, with their young perhaps sometimes being targeted.[8]
The cave hyena's diet differed little from contemporary African spotted hyenas.[9] The most common prey found in Europe are invariably horses, and in the Srbsko Chlum-Komin Cave alone (in the Czech Republic), horse remains make up 51% of the species present. This predilection for equines distinguishes the cave hyena from today’s spotted hyenas, which are known to target smaller antelope (impala, gazelle, wildebeest) as well as opportunistically scavenge carrion. Steppe bison remains are generally rare in hyena burrows, and it has been proposed that, except during glacial periods, these were avoided to lessen competition with cave lions and wolves. However, certain sites, such as the cave of San Teodoro, where bison make up 50% of the remains, indicate that certain populations of hyenas specialized their hunting where mammoths and bears were scarce, whose carcasses were a main source of food in much of Europe. Cervids are rare or absent in the burrows, probably being too fast for hyenas.[10][11] However, exceptions to this pattern also exist; the site of Fouvent-Saint-Andoche represents a hyena den containing remains of red deer, Irish elk, and reindeer.[12] Cave hyenas extensively engaged in cannibalism.[13]
History of discovery and classification
editAlthough the first full account of the cave hyena was given by Georges Cuvier in 1812, skeletal fragments of the cave hyena have been described in scientific literature since the 18th century, though they were frequently misidentified. The first recorded mention of the cave hyena in literature occurs in Kundmann's 1737 tome Rariora Naturæ et Artis, where the author misidentified a hyena's mandibular ramus as that of a calf. In 1774, Esper erroneously described hyena teeth discovered in Gailenreuth as those of a lion, and in 1784, Collini described a cave hyena skull as that of a seal. The past presence of hyenas in Great Britain was revealed after William Buckland's examination of the contents of Kirkdale Cave, which was discovered to have once been the location of several hyena den sites. Buckland's findings were followed by further discoveries by Clift and Whidbey in Oreston, Plymouth.[14]
In his own 1812 account, Cuvier mentioned a number of European localities where cave hyena remains were found, and considered it a different species from the spotted hyena on account of its superior size. He elaborated his view in his Ossemens Fossiles (1823), noting how the cave hyena's digital extremities were shorter and thicker than those of the spotted hyena. His views were largely accepted throughout the first half of the 19th century, finding support in de Blainville and Richard Owen among others. Further justifications in separating the two animals included differences in the tubercular portion of the lower carnassial. Boyd Dawkins, writing in 1865, was the first to definitely cast doubt over the separation of the spotted and cave hyena, stating that the aforementioned tooth characteristics were consistent with mere individual variation. Writing again in 1877, he further stated after comparing the two animals' skulls that there are no characters of specific value.[14]
Genetics
editAnalysis of the mitochondrial genomes of Eurasian Crocuta specimens shows no clear separation from African lineages. However, an analysis of full nuclear genomes of both European and East Asian cave hyenas published in 2020 suggests that African and Eurasian Crocuta populations were largely separate, having estimated to have diverged from each other around 2.5 million years ago, closely corresponding to the age of the earliest Crocuta specimens in Eurasia, which are around 2 million years old from China. The nuclear genome results also suggested that the European and East Asian populations (often assigned to the separate subspecies C. crocuta ultima) were strongly genetically divergent from each other, but were more closely related to each other overall than to African Crocuta populations. Analysis of the nuclear genome suggests that there had been interbreeding between these populations for some time after the split, which likely explains the discordance between the nuclear and mitochondrial genome results, with the mitochondrial genomes of African and European Crocuta more closely related to each other than to East Asian Crocuta, suggesting gene flow between the two groups after the split between the East Asian and European populations.[1] Some authors have suggested that the two subspecies should be raised to species level as Crocuta spelaea and Crocuta ultima.[2] A 2024 study of a cave hyena genome from Sicily found that as with the 2020 study, there was strong genetic separation between Eurasian cave and African spotted hyenas, but unlike the 2020 study, there was no robust support for a basal split between East Asian/Siberian and European cave hyenas, with the Sicilian cave hyena found to be the earliest diverging cave hyena lineage, with less interbreeding with African hyenas than other European cave hyenas.[15]
Distribution
editCrocuta first appeared outside of Africa in Asia during the Early Pleistocene around 2 million years ago,[1] before arriving in Europe at the beginning of the Middle Pleistocene around 800,000 years ago.[16] Crocuta was widely distributed across northern Eurasia during the Middle-Late Pleistocene, spanning from the Iberian Peninsula, Britain and Ireland in the West, across southern Siberia, Mongolia and northern China to the Pacific Coast of the Russian Far East.[8] C. c. ultima at times ranged as far southeast as Taiwan, as well as Thailand and Laos in Southeast Asia,[17][18] while C. c. spelaea ranged into the Middle East, as far south as the Judaean Desert[19] and as far east as western Iran (as evidenced by sites such as Wezmeh Cave in the Zagros Mountains).[8]
Relationships with hominids
editInteractions
editKills partially processed by Neanderthals and then by cave hyenas indicate that hyenas would occasionally steal Neanderthal kills; and cave hyenas and Neanderthals competed for cave sites. Many caves show alternating occupations by hyenas and Neanderthals.[20] There is fossil evidence of humans in Middle Pleistocene Europe butchering and presumably consuming hyenas.[21]
In rock art
editThe cave hyena is depicted in a few examples of Upper Palaeolithic rock art in France. A painting from the Chauvet Cave depicts a hyena outlined and represented in profile, with two legs, with its head and front part with well distinguishable spotted coloration pattern. Because of the specimen's steeped profile, it is thought that the painting was originally meant to represent a cave bear, but was modified as a hyena. In Lascaux, a red and black rock painting of a hyena is present in the part of the cave known as the Diverticule axial, and is depicted in profile, with four limbs, showing an animal with a steep back. The body and the long neck have spots, including the flanks. An image on a cave in Ariège shows an incompletely outlined and deeply engraved figure, representing a part of an elongated neck, smoothly passing into part of the animal's forelimb on the proximal side. Its head is in profile, with a possibly re-engraved muzzle. The ear is typical of the spotted hyena, as it is rounded. An image in the Le Gabillou Cave in Dordogne shows a deeply engraved zoomorphic figure with a head in frontal view and an elongated neck with part of the forelimb in profile. It has large round eyes and short, rounded ears which are set far from each other. It has a broad, line-like mouth that evokes a smile. Though originally thought to represent a composite or zoomorphic hybrid, it is probable it is a spotted hyena based on its broad muzzle and long neck. The relative scarcity of hyena depictions in Paleolithic rock art has been theorised to be due to the animal's lower rank in the animal worship hierarchy; the cave hyena's appearance was likely unappealing to Ice Age hunters, and it was not sought after as prey. Also, it was not a serious rival like the cave lion or bear, and it lacked the impressiveness of the mammoth or woolly rhino.[7]
Extinction
editA 2014 study concluded that the youngest well-dated remains of cave hyenas in Europe date to around 31,000 years ago.[8] A later 2020 study concluded that cave hyenas may have persisted as late as 7,000 years ago in the southern Iberian Peninsula based on radiocarbon dating of likely hyena coprolites found in caves in the region, but suggested that the dates should be considered with caution due to potential issues with contamination.[22] A 2021 study found the youngest specimens in East Asia date to around 20,000 years ago.[23] Potential causal factors for extinction include decreasing temperatures, competition with other carnivores, including humans for food and living space, and decreased prey abundance.[8] Evidence suggests that climate change alone cannot account for the cave hyena's extinction in Europe and that other factors, such as human activity and decreasing prey abundance, are necessary to explain it.[3]
Gallery
edit-
Cranium from Wookey Hole, now in Taunton Museum
-
Skull from Wookey Hole, now in Taunton Museum
-
Anterior and posterior views of the right forefoot, from Tor Bryan Caves near Torquay, now kept in British Museum
-
Anterior and posterior views of the right hind foot, from Tor Bryan Caves near Torquay, now kept in British Museum.
-
Permanent dentition of a Pleistocene cave hyena from Tor Bryan Caves near Torquay, now kept in British Museum.
-
Permanent dentition, from Tor Bryan Caves near Torquay (now kept in British Museum), Creswell Caves in Derbyshire (now kept in Manchester's Owen College Museum), Kirkdale Cave and Wookey Hole (now kept in Oxford Museum).
-
Jaws and cranium from Kent's Hole, Torquay (now in British Museum) and Wookey Hole (now in Taunton Museum).
-
Vertebrae from Wookey Hole (now in Taunton Museum).
-
Vertebrae from Wookey Hole (now in Taunton Museum).
-
Vertebrae from Wookey Hole (now in Taunton Museum).
-
Pelvis from Wookey Hole (now in Taunton Museum).
-
Scapula from Creswell Caves, Derbyshire (now in Owens College Museum, Manchester).
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b c Westbury, Michael V.; Hartmann, Stefanie; Barlow, Axel; Preick, Michaela; Ridush, Bogdan; Nagel, Doris; Rathgeber, Thomas; Ziegler, Reinhard; Baryshnikov, Gennady; Sheng, Guilian; Ludwig, Arne; Wiesel, Ingrid; Dalen, Love; Bibi, Faysal; Werdelin, Lars (2020-03-13). "Hyena paleogenomes reveal a complex evolutionary history of cross-continental gene flow between spotted and cave hyena". Science Advances. 6 (11): eaay0456. Bibcode:2020SciA....6..456W. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay0456. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 7069707. PMID 32201717.
- ^ a b Lewis, Margaret E.; Werdelin, Lars (2022-04-14). "A revision of the genus Crocuta (Mammalia, Hyaenidae)". Palaeontographica Abteilung A. 322 (1–4): 1–115. Bibcode:2022PalAA.322....1L. doi:10.1127/pala/2022/0120. ISSN 0375-0442.
- ^ a b Varela, Sara; Lobo, Jorge M.; Rodríguez, Jesús; Batra, Persaram (1 August 2010). "Were the Late Pleistocene climatic changes responsible for the disappearance of the European spotted hyena populations? Hindcasting a species geographic distribution across time". Quaternary Science Reviews. 29 (17): 2027–2035. Bibcode:2010QSRv...29.2027V. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.04.017. ISSN 0277-3791. Retrieved 13 January 2024 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
- ^ Klein, Richard G.; Scott, Katharine (July 1989). "Glacial/Interglacial Size Variation in Fossil Spotted Hyenas ( Crocuta crocuta ) from Britain". Quaternary Research. 32 (1): 88–95. Bibcode:1989QuRes..32...88K. doi:10.1016/0033-5894(89)90034-3. ISSN 0033-5894.
- ^ Sauqué, V; Rabal-Garcés, R; Madurell-Malaperia, J; Gisbert, M; Zamora, S; Torres, T; Ortíz, J; Cuenca-Bescós, G (2017). "Pleistocene cave hyenas in the Iberian Peninsula: New insights from Los Aprendices cave (Moncayo, Zaragoza". Palaeontologia Electronica. doi:10.26879/622. ISSN 1094-8074.
- ^ a b Vinuesa, Víctor; Iurino, Dawid A.; Madurell-Malapeira, Joan; Liu, Jinyi; Fortuny, Josep; Sardella, Raffaele; Alba, David M. (August 2016). "Inferences of social behavior in bone-cracking hyaenids (Carnivora, Hyaenidae) based on digital paleoneurological techniques: Implications for human–carnivoran interactions in the Pleistocene". Quaternary International. 413: 7–14. Bibcode:2016QuInt.413....7V. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2015.10.037.
- ^ a b Spassov N.; Stoytchev T. 2004. The presence of cave hyaena (Crocuta crocuta spelaea) in the Upper Palaeolithic rock art of Europe Archived 2012-04-15 at the Wayback Machine. Historia naturalis bulgarica, 16: 159-166.
- ^ a b c d e Stuart, Anthony J.; Lister, Adrian M. (July 2014). "New radiocarbon evidence on the extirpation of the spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta (Erxl.)) in northern Eurasia". Quaternary Science Reviews. 96: 108–116. Bibcode:2014QSRv...96..108S. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.10.010.
- ^ Rivals, Florent; Baryshnikov, Gennady F.; Prilepskaya, Natalya E.; Belyaev, Ruslan I. (1 September 2022). "Diet and ecological niches of the Late Pleistocene hyenas Crocuta spelaea and C. ultima ussurica based on a study of tooth microwear". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 601: 111125. Bibcode:2022PPP...60111125R. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2022.111125. ISSN 0031-0182.
- ^ DIEDRICH, C.G. & ŽÁK, K. 2006. Prey deposits and den sites of the Upper Pleistocene hyena Crocuta crocuta spelaea (Goldfuss, 1823) in horizontal and vertical caves of the Bohemian Karst (Czech Republic). Bulletin of Geosciences 81(4), 237–276 (25 figures). Czech Geological Survey, Prague. ISSN 1214-1119.
- ^ Diedrich, C. 2010. “Specialized horse killers in Europe – foetal horse remains in the Late Pleistocene Srbsko Chlum-Komín Cave hyena den in the Bohemian Karst (Czech Republic) and actualistic comparisons to modern African spotted hyenas as zebra hunters.” Quaternary International, vol. 220, no. 1-2, pp. 174-187.
- ^ Fourvel, Jean-Baptiste; Fosse, Philippe; Fernandez, Philippe; Antoine, Pierre-Olivier (26 June 2015). "Large mammals of Fouvent-Saint-Andoche (Haute-Saône, France): a glimpse into a Late Pleistocene hyena den". Geodiversitas. 37 (2): 237–266. doi:10.5252/g2015n2a5. ISSN 1280-9659. Retrieved 11 February 2024.
- ^ Diedrich, Cajus G. (2 March 2020). "Eating head first—When European Ice Age spotted hyenas crushed their own to pieces". Acta Zoologica. 102 (2): 143–164. doi:10.1111/azo.12323. ISSN 0001-7272. Retrieved 27 May 2024 – via Wiley Online Library.
- ^ a b Dawkins, William Boyd; Sanford, W. Ayshford; Reynolds, Sydney Hugh. (1866). A monograph of the British pleistocene mammalia. Palaeontographical Society (Great Britain). pp. 1-6.
- ^ Catalano, Giulio; Iurino, Dawid Adam; Modi, Alessandra; L.A. Paijmans, Johanna; Sardella, Raffaele; Sineo, Luca; Caramelli, David; Barlow, Axel (September 2024). "Palaeogenomic data from a Late Pleistocene coprolite clarifies the phylogenetic position of Sicilian cave hyena". Quaternary Science Reviews. 340: 108859. Bibcode:2024QSRv..34008859C. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108859.
- ^ Iannucci, Alessio; Mecozzi, Beniamino; Sardella, Raffaele; Iurino, Dawid Adam (15 November 2021). "The extinction of the giant hyena Pachycrocuta brevirostris and a reappraisal of the Epivillafranchian and Galerian Hyaenidae in Europe: Faunal turnover during the Early–Middle Pleistocene Transition". Quaternary Science Reviews. 272: 107240. Bibcode:2021QSRv..27207240I. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.107240. S2CID 239548772. Retrieved 25 August 2022.
- ^ Suraprasit, Kantapon; Jaeger, Jean-Jacques; Chaimanee, Yaowalak; Benammi, Mouloud; Chavasseau, Olivier; Yamee, Chotima; Tian, Pannipa; Panha, Somsak (July 2015). "A complete skull of Crocuta crocuta ultima indicates a late Middle Pleistocene age for the Khok Sung (northeastern Thailand) vertebrate fauna". Quaternary International. 374: 34–45. Bibcode:2015QuInt.374...34S. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2014.12.062.
- ^ Bacon, Anne-Marie; Westaway, Kira; Antoine, Pierre-Olivier; Duringer, Philippe; Blin, Amandine; Demeter, Fabrice; Ponche, Jean-Luc; Zhao, Jian-Xin; Barnes, Lani Minnie; Sayavonkhamdy, Thongsa; Thuy, Nguyen Thi Kim; Long, Vu The; Patole-Edoumba, Elise; Shackelford, Laura (March 2015). "Late Pleistocene mammalian assemblages of Southeast Asia: New dating, mortality profiles and evolution of the predator–prey relationships in an environmental context". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 422: 101–127. Bibcode:2015PPP...422..101B. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.01.011.
- ^ Marom, Nimrod; Lazagabaster, Ignacio A.; Shafir, Roee; Natalio, Filipe; Eisenmann, Vera; Horwitz, Liora Kolska (May 2022). "The Late Middle Pleistocene mammalian fauna of Oumm Qatafa Cave, Judean Desert: taxonomy, taphonomy and palaeoenvironment". Journal of Quaternary Science. 37 (4): 612–638. Bibcode:2022JQS....37..612M. doi:10.1002/jqs.3414. ISSN 0267-8179. PMC 9314136. PMID 35915614.
- ^ Fosse, P. 1999. "Cave occupation during Palaeolithic times: Man and/or Hyena?" in The Role of Early Humans in the accumulation if European Lower and Middle Palaeolithic bone assemblages, Ergebnisse eines Kolloquiums, vol. 42, Monographien. Edited by S. Gaudzinski and E. Turner, pp. 73-88. Bonn: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums.
- ^ Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. (2010). "The scavenger or the scavenged?" (PDF). Journal of Taphonomy. 1: 75–76. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-08-29. Retrieved 2012-11-26.
- ^ Ochando, J.; Carrión, J.S.; Rodríguez-Vidal, J.; Jiménez-Arenas, J.M.; Fernández, S.; Amorós, G.; Munuera, M.; Scott, L.; Stewart, J.R.; Knul, M.V.; Toro-Moyano, I.; Ponce de León, M.; Zollikofer, C. (August 2020). "Palynology and chronology of hyaena coprolites from the Piñar karstic Caves Las Ventanas and Carihuela, southern Spain". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 552: 109771. Bibcode:2020PPP...55209771O. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109771.
- ^ Hu, Jiaming; Westbury, Michael V.; Yuan, Junxia; Zhang, Zhen; Chen, Shungang; Xiao, Bo; Hou, Xindong; Ji, Hailong; Lai, Xulong; Hofreiter, Michael; Sheng, Guilian (27 January 2021). "Ancient mitochondrial genomes from Chinese cave hyenas provide insights into the evolutionary history of the genus Crocuta". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 288 (1943): 20202934. doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.2934. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 7893252. PMID 33499784.
External links
edit- (in French) Cuvier, Georges, Note sur les ossemens fossiles d’hyènes, Nouveau Bulletin des Sciences, Tome 1, 1807-1809 (pp. 149–150).