Institute for Creation Research: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 19:1619:16, 3 June 2024 StephenMacky1 talk contribs 38,735 bytes −201‎ Reverted 2 edits by Drtunz (talk): Unsourced changes and tampering with quotation. undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 19:1319:13, 3 June 2024 Drtunz talk contribs m 38,936 bytes −43‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted
curprev 19:1119:11, 3 June 2024 Drtunz talk contribs m 38,979 bytes +244‎ This institute's work is now based on hard scientific evidence, deep archaeological research, and at times stunning historic and literary corroboration. This article, which calls the group 'pseudoscientific,' is now archaic and needs to be rewritten. They are now less concerned with promoting the Christian faith than in making these recent and dramatic discoveries known to the public at large. undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 14:0314:03, 7 May 2024 MrOllie talk contribs 38,735 bytes +35‎ Restored revision 1222686765 by 331dot (talk): It is based on the cited WP:RS undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 14:0014:00, 7 May 2024 68.73.225.172 talk 38,700 bytes −35‎ The use of pseudoscience is based on ideology instead of fact undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted
curprev 10:3910:39, 7 May 2024 331dot talk contribs 38,735 bytes −5‎ Reverted 1 edit by 69.122.145.170 (talk): Restore broken link undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
curprev 10:3110:31, 7 May 2024 69.122.145.170 talk 38,740 bytes +5‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted

curprev 08:3308:33, 5 May 2024 331dot talk contribs 38,735 bytes −5‎ Reverted 1 edit by 69.122.145.170 (talk): Broke a link undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
curprev 04:2004:20, 5 May 2024 69.122.145.170 talk 38,740 bytes +5‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 08:0108:01, 31 December 2023 Tgeorgescu talk contribs m 38,735 bytes +92‎ Reverted 1 edit by 66.68.161.123 (talk) to last revision by MrOllie undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 07:4307:43, 31 December 2023 66.68.161.123 talk 38,643 bytes −92‎ Removed “pseudoscientific” in the description. The research done is true science, not “pseudo” at all. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 14:3214:32, 10 September 2023 InternetArchiveBot talk contribs 38,735 bytes +364‎ Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5) (Whoop whoop pull up - 14928 undo

curprev 02:3202:32, 16 August 2023 Discospinster talk contribs 38,371 bytes +589‎ replace sourced content undo Tag: Manual revert
curprev 02:3102:31, 16 August 2023 110.142.168.214 talk 37,782 bytes −589‎ Removing irrelevant reference and biased language. undo Tags: Reverted references removed

curprev 23:5423:54, 12 June 2023 331dot talk contribs 38,363 bytes +35‎ Reverted 1 edit by 98.20.152.212 (talk): Sources use this term undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 23:4323:43, 12 June 2023 98.20.152.212 talk 38,328 bytes −35‎ took out the completely subject word 'pseudoscientific' undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit

curprev 16:0116:01, 4 June 2023 Roxy the dog talk contribs 38,363 bytes +134‎ Restored revision 1154518670 by LizardJr8 (talk): Return to good following Good Faith WP:AGF true believer edit undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
curprev 16:0016:00, 4 June 2023 134.65.139.203 talk 38,229 bytes −16‎ Removed the phrase mythical in reference to Noah's ark. Some may hold the opinion that Noah's Ark was just mythical, others believe the flood to have been real. No citation is given to substantiate either opinion, and stating it a mythical implies fact without substantiation. This opinion does not add to the article. undo Tag: Reverted
curprev 15:4815:48, 4 June 2023 134.65.139.203 talk 38,245 bytes −118‎ Removed some emotionally driven loaded phrases such as psudoscience (pretend science), given this is clearly an opinion rather than fact. It essentially says the author disagrees with the conclusions of creation scientists, but that's irrelevant to this page which I would have thought should be objective. Also removed reference to "mainstream science", as again it's a heavily opinionated meaningless term. There are many theories, and many debates with differing views in all branches of Science. undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 02:2202:22, 23 April 2023 McSly talk contribs 38,363 bytes +6‎ Undid revision 1151284604 by 70.124.149.10 (talk) Correct before undo Tags: Undo Reverted
curprev 02:1402:14, 23 April 2023 70.124.149.10 talk 38,357 bytes −6‎ Removed "pseudo" so that the article is neutral and not biased against ICR. We need to maintain objectivity. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

curprev 01:4101:41, 10 March 2023 331dot talk contribs 38,363 bytes +35‎ Reverted 1 edit by Troopersho (talk): Without this it makes it seem like a legitimate science, not all readers click on links undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
curprev 01:2901:29, 10 March 2023 Troopersho talk contribs 38,328 bytes −35‎ Removed redundant word that implies negative connotations. They can just go to the link of creation science to read that it's psuedoscience. undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 12:0712:07, 23 January 2023 InternetArchiveBot talk contribs 38,363 bytes +378‎ Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.3 undo