[go: up one dir, main page]
Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Learners' Acceptability of Adapting the Different Teaching Methodologies for Students

Learners' Acceptability of Adapting the Different Teaching Methodologies for Students

Amar Shukla, Shailey Singhal, Tanupriya Choudhury, Sachi Nandan Mohanty
Copyright: © 2023 |Volume: 19 |Issue: 1 |Pages: 20
ISSN: 1548-3673|EISSN: 1548-3681|EISBN13: 9781668479070|DOI: 10.4018/IJeC.318335
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Shukla, Amar, et al. "Learners' Acceptability of Adapting the Different Teaching Methodologies for Students." IJEC vol.19, no.1 2023: pp.1-20. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.318335

APA

Shukla, A., Singhal, S., Choudhury, T., & Mohanty, S. N. (2023). Learners' Acceptability of Adapting the Different Teaching Methodologies for Students. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 19(1), 1-20. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.318335

Chicago

Shukla, Amar, et al. "Learners' Acceptability of Adapting the Different Teaching Methodologies for Students," International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC) 19, no.1: 1-20. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.318335

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

The learning methodologies used by students are directly proportional to their abilities to learn. Various learning methodologies have been used to gain student acceptance and satisfaction with the module taught by the teacher. In this article, the authors approach the different methods and analyze these methodologies. To determine the impact, they considered both the face-to-face learning process and the online mode of learning to determine the exact effect on the student. So, to address this, a two-way survey was conducted. The first revealed the student satisfaction rate with the course approached through the online mode of learning. Second, a comparative study was made using ANOVA methods between the online way and the face-to-face methodology. A significant observation was made in the test, and it shows that the hybrid model of teaching provides better performance than the face-to-face method.