With the intensification and rising frequency of disasters in recent years, implementing disaster preparedness measures has become increasingly important. However, local governments must be prepared for disasters, with their limited resources of personnel and budget, to make the redressal plans relevant for facing problems such as population decline. This study aims to enhance resilience in the field of disaster management by facilitating identification of problems in the disaster management plan of local governments, and promotion of mutual understanding among those involved. For this purpose, a tool has been developed to evaluate local disaster management measures from the viewpoints of both local governments and residents, and to promote smooth communication and coordination among the stakeholders. A questionnaire survey was conducted using an index for self-assessment by local government officials, which was formulated based on the literature of the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Based on the survey results, the elements of resilience were classified into three groups depicting the abilities to collaborate and organize, adapt to the environment, and manage for the next generation. The evaluation was conducted in four local governments. In two regions, the residents’ awareness and preparedness for a disaster were surveyed. The survey results revealed that the questionnaire should be improved; nevertheless, the authors were able to identify the problems of local governments and the fields that the residents do not know sufficiently about. The results indicate the possibility to apply this method in other regions in the future.

1. [1] Cabinet Office Japan, “White Paper on Disaster Management 2022,” 2023. https://www.bousai.go.jp/en/documentation/white_paper/pdf/2023/SF1-2.pdf [Accessed December 10, 2023]
2. [2] Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, “The Population of Our Country,” (in Japanese). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/newpage_21481.html [Accessed December 10, 2023]
3. [3] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development, “Sustainable Development.” https://sdgs.un.org/ [Accessed December 10, 2023]
4. [4] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030,” 2015. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030 [Accessed December 10, 2023]
5. [5] A. Fujisawa, Y. Masuda, K. Ando, M. Araki, and K. Tanaka, “Study on Platform Tools and Practice on “Sustainability Scoring Index”,” J. of Asian Urban Environment, Vol.2023, pp. 353-356, 2023.
6. [6] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, “Disaster resilience scorecard for cities detailed assessment,” 2017. https://www.undrr.org/publication/disaster-resilience-scorecard-cities [Accessed June 1, 2022]
7. [7] The Rockefeller Foundation and ARUP, “City Resilience Framework April 2014,” (Updated December 2015), 2014. https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/report/city-resilience-framework/ [Accessed July 1, 2022]
8. [8] M. Araki, “The Formulation of the Draft Work on “Sustainability Scoring Index”,” 2023 (in Japanese). https://resilience-japan.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/20230227_doc1.pdf [Accessed March 30, 2023]
9. [9] Japan Meteorological Agency, “Correspondence Between Disaster Prevention Weather Information and Alert Levels,” 2022 (in Japanese). https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/kishou/know/bosai/alertlevel.html [Accessed July 1, 2023]