[go: up one dir, main page]



Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.


If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.

DESIGN AND TESTS OF A VARIABLE–FLOW FAN NOZZLE

Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org

Citation:  Transactions of the ASAE. 45(2): 287–295. (doi: 10.13031/2013.8519) @2002
Authors:   A. R. Womac, Q. D. Bui
Keywords:   Application equipment, Applicators, Atomizers, Droplet size, Droplet studies, Droplets, Nozzles, Sprayers, Spraying, Spraying equipment, Sprays, Turndown ratio, Variable–rate application
A newconcept variableflow fan nozzle (VFFN) was developed with an aim to variablerate chemicalapplication. A splitend meter plunger in a tapered sleeve served as a variable orifice that varied flow rate and droplet sizeand created a fan spray by impinging streams of liquid together. The fan spray exited at a right angle to the plane of the slitas previously hypothesized due to jetting of spalled droplets. Longitudinal position of the plunger in the sleeve determinedinstantaneous nozzle capacity. A diaphragm was selected to position the plunger for simplicity in this study. Vector forceanalyses indicated that longitudinal plunger position depended on line pressure, control pressure, diaphragm area, plungerend area, spring constant of split plunger end, maximum slit opening, and taper angle. As expected, the prototype flow ratewas sensitive (~0.02 L min 1 kPa 1 line pressure) to the pressure balance across a 248mm 2 diaphragm and to a 15,500 Nm 1 plunger spring constant.

Three VFFN prototypes with spray angles of 50, 70, and 90were constructed and tested. A single prototype was testedrather than a boom full of prototypes. Results indicated that the VFFN spray angle equaled the taper angle of the nozzle sleeveat a line pressure of 276 kPa. Observed turndown ratio (maximum to minimum flow rate) for the 90prototype was 13 to 1based on spray angles, flow rates, and pattern widths (at 45 cm nozzle height) ranging from 65to 100, 0.227 to 3.028 Lmin 1 , and 70 to 110 cm, respectively. Multiple prototype effects on spray distribution across a boom were not investigated.By adjusting the control pressure from 414 to 138 kPa, the droplet spectrum DV0.1, Dv0.5, and Dv0.9 values were varied from58 to 190 m, 141 to 522 m, and 300 to 850 m, respectively. Independent control of liquid flow rate and droplet size spectrumwas achieved by separately varying line pressure and control pressure.

"/>

A newconcept variableflow fan nozzle (VFFN) was developed with an aim to variablerate chemical application. A splitend meter plunger in a tapered sleeve served as a variable orifice that varied flow rate and droplet size and created a fan spray by impinging streams of liquid together. The fan spray exited at a right angle to the plane of the slit as previously hypothesized due to jetting of spalled droplets. Longitudinal position of the plunger in the sleeve determined instantaneous nozzle capacity. A diaphragm was selected to position the plunger for simplicity in this study. Vector force analyses indicated that longitudinal plunger position depended on line pressure, control pressure, diaphragm area, plunger end area, spring constant of split plunger end, maximum slit opening, and taper angle. As expected, the prototype flow rate was sensitive (~0.02 L min 1 kPa 1 line pressure) to the pressure balance across a 248mm 2 diaphragm and to a 15,500 N m 1 plunger spring constant.

Three VFFN prototypes with spray angles of 50  , 70  , and 90  were constructed and tested. A single prototype was tested rather than a boom full of prototypes. Results indicated that the VFFN spray angle equaled the taper angle of the nozzle sleeve at a line pressure of 276 kPa. Observed turndown ratio (maximum to minimum flow rate) for the 90  prototype was 13 to 1 based on spray angles, flow rates, and pattern widths (at 45 cm nozzle height) ranging from 65  to 100  , 0.227 to 3.028 L min 1 , and 70 to 110 cm, respectively. Multiple prototype effects on spray distribution across a boom were not investigated. By adjusting the control pressure from 414 to 138 kPa, the droplet spectrum DV0.1, Dv0.5, and Dv0.9 values were varied from 58 to 190 m, 141 to 522 m, and 300 to 850 m, respectively. Independent control of liquid flow rate and droplet size spectrum was achieved by separately varying line pressure and control pressure.

(Download PDF)    (Export to EndNotes)