[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Metamodeling-Based Semantic Web Languages

  • Conference paper
E-Commerce and Web Technologies (EC-Web 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2738))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

RDF Schema and Web Ontology Language (OWL) have nonstandard metamodeling architecture. As a result, these languages are difficulty to read and implement. Thus it is significative to make the OWL meta-model simpler. This paper introduces a modified RDF Schema (M-RDFS) as a metamodeling basis for OWL; it also describes how to overcome some problems of the original RDF Schema. Based on this metamodeling architecture, the M-RDFS will be a meta-language for OWL, thus it will not directly define specific ontologies. This paper introduces a conventional metamodeling architecture for semantic web languages. This method makes the modified RDF Schema easier to read and formalize, and it offers a firm semantic basis for OWL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee, T.B.: Weaving the Web. Harper, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, T.B., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American (May 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fensel, D., Horrocks, I.: OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2) (March/April 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Decker, S., et al.: The Semantic Web: the respective roles of XML and RDF. IEEE Internet Computing 4(5), 63–74 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dean, M., Connolly, D.: OWL Web Ontology Language 1.0 Reference. W3C Working Draft (July 2002), http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-owl-ref-20020729/.29

  7. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Fensel, D.: Layering the Semantic Web: Problems and Directions. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, p. 16. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Lassila, O., Swick, R.: Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification. W3C Recommendation, February 22 (1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax

  9. Brickley, D., Guha, R.: Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification, March 27 (2000), http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327

  10. Pan, J., Horrocks, I.: Metamodeling architecture of web ontology languages. Presented at First Semantic Web Working Symposium, SWWS 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nejdl, W., Wolpers, M., Capella, C.: The RDF Schema Specification Revisited. In: Modelle und Modellierungssprachen in Informatik und Wirtschaftsinformatik, Modellierung 2000 (April 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Broekstra, D., et al.: Enabling Knowledge Representation on the Web by extending the RDF Schema. In: 10th International WWW Conference, Hong Kong (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. MOF-Parters. Meta Object Facility version 1.1 (July 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yacoub, S.: Bootstrapping Semantic Web Languages using a UML Meta- Modeling Approach July 26 (2002), http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2002/HPL-2002-200.pdf

  15. CDIF Framework for Modeling and Extensibility, EIA/IS-107 (November 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guha, R.V., Hayes, P.: Lbase: Semantics for Languages of the Semantic Web (January 2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/lbase/

  17. Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Two Proposals for Semantic Web Ontology Language. In: 2002 International Workshop on Description Logics - DL 2002, Toulouse, France (April 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cranefield, S., Purvis, M.: UML as an ontology modelling language. In: IJCAI-1999 Workshop on Intelligent Information Integration (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cranefield, S.: Networked Knowledge Representation and Exchange using UML and RDF. Journal of Digital Information 1(8) (February 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nejdl, W., Dhraief, H., Wolpers, M.: O-telos-rdf: A resource description format with enhanced meta-modeling functionalities based on o-telos. In: Workshop on Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation at the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001), Victoria, BC, Canada (October 2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, W., Dong, Y. (2003). Metamodeling-Based Semantic Web Languages. In: Bauknecht, K., Tjoa, A.M., Quirchmayr, G. (eds) E-Commerce and Web Technologies. EC-Web 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2738. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45229-4_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45229-4_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40808-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45229-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics