Abstract
A malware can completely destroy the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of a system once it comes into contact with it, it poses a serious threat to computer security. Various mitigation and detection techniques have been developed over decades to address this problem. In order to deal with complex datasets that result in a high computational overhead and resource consumption, a new model that uses microservices to implement the random forest algorithm for malware detection and analysis has been proposed in this paper. The latter part of this paper discusses the overall microservice model and how it can lead to improved results overtime when the size of dataset provided increases by thousands. In conclusion a detailed difference between the micro- services-based model and the non-microserviced model has been presented by use of the acquired results gained during the application phase, the comparison details the parameters such as ROC curve, precision recall curve, bootstrapping resampling for AUC & a detailed feature selection of dataset to showcase the difference in values between the microservices model dataset and baseline model dataset.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Raff, E., Charles, N.: A survey of machine learning methods and challenges for Windows malware classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.09271 (2020)
Tram, T.-H., et al.: An empirical study on unsupervised network anomaly detection using generative adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 20–29 (2020)
Angelos, C., Messias, M.R., Ilir, J., Kostiantyn, K., Fabrice, R., Andreas, K.: The state of the art in enhancing trust in machine learning models with the use of visualizations. Comput. Graph. Forum 39(3), 713–756 (2020)
Zhiyuan, Y., Zack, K., Qiben, Y., Ning, Z.: Security and privacy in the emerging cyber-physical world: a survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 23(3), 1879–1919 (2021)
Han-Shin, J., Chanshin, P., Eunhyoung, L., Kun, C.H., Jaedon, P.: Path loss prediction based on machine learning techniques: Principal component analysis, artificial neural network, and Gaussian process. Sensors 20(7), 19–27 (2020)
Nikos, F., et al.: Intent-driven orchestration of serverless applications in the computing continuum. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 154, 72–86 (2024)
Mathew, A., Andrikopoulos, V., Blaauw, F.J., Karastoyanova, D.: Pattern-based serverless data processing pipelines for Function-as-a-Service orchestration systems. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 154, 87–100 (2024)
Anton, K.: Microservices Architecture: practical implementations, benefits, and nuances (2024)
Swati, K., Vatsal, T., Hitesh, T.: Cyber Security on the Edge: Efficient Enabling of Machine Learning on IoT Devices (2024)
Emami, K.M., Saeed, S.: A scalable modified deep reinforcement learning algorithm for serverless IoT microservice composition infrastructure in fog layer. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 153, 206–221 (2024)
Jia-Hao, S., Chun-Wei, L.J. Gautam, S.: Distributed learning mechanisms for anomaly detection in privacy-aware energy grid management systems. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. (2024)
Zhaorui, W., Yuhui, D., Yi, Z., Jie, L., Shujie, P., Xiao, Q.: FaaSBatch: boosting serverless efficiency with in-container parallelism and resource multiplexing. IEEE Transactions on Computers (2024)
Rui, G., Julio, D., Cesar, Q., Manuel, S.M., Filipe, S.M.: Architecture proposal for deploying and integrating intelligent models in ABI. Procedia Comput. Sci. 231, 445–451 (2024)
Block, S.: How to adapt and implement a large-scale agile framework in your organization. In: Block, S. (ed.) Large-Scale Agile Frameworks: Agile Frameworks, Agile Infrastructure and Pragmatic Solutions for Digital Transformation, pp. 65–168. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67782-7_4
Chongjian, Y., et al.: Leveraging LLMs for KPIs Retrieval from Hybrid Long-Document: A Comprehensive Framework and Dataset. arXiv (2023)
Sadiq, A.: Intrusion Detection Using the WEKA Machine Learning Tool (2021)
Ian, C.: Transparent Machine Learning: Theory and Computation (2023)
Weikai, Y., Mengchen, L., Zheng, W., Shixia, L.: Foundation models meet visualizations: Challenges and opportunities. arXiv (2023)
Elmachtoub, A.N., Nam Liang, J.C., McNellis, R.: Decision trees for decision-making under the predict-then-optimize framework. In: International Conference on Machine Learning pp. 2858–2867 (2020)
Fredrik, O., Erik, S.: Exploratory data analysis of live 5G radio access network configuration data using interpretable machine learning (2023)
Barbara, T.: Causal Network Inference of High-Throughput Data with Structural Equation Models (2024)
Dombrowski, A.-K., Gerken, J.E., Müller, K.-R., Kessel, P.:Diffeomorphic counterfactuals with generative models. In: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2023)
Omar, K., Paolo, G., Paolo, C.G.: Probabilistic framework to evaluate the resilience of engineering systems using Bayesian and dynamic Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 198, 106813 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Goel, M., Thakur, S., Kumar, N., Gupta, N., Singh, M. (2025). An Optimized Approach Towards Malware Detection Using Java Microservices. In: Singh, M., et al. Advances in Computing and Data Sciences. ICACDS 2024. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2194. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70906-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70906-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-70905-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-70906-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)