See Walker (1996, p. 156), Whittaker and Watson (1927, p. 481),
Serre (1973, p. 109), and McKean and Moll (1999, §3.3).
For (20.9.3) combination of (20.4.6) and (23.6.5) –
(23.6.7) yields
,
, where .
Then by application of (19.25.35) and use of the properties that
is homogenous and of degree in its three variables
(§§19.16(ii), 19.16(iii)), we derive
.
This equation becomes (20.9.3) when the ’s are cancelled and is renamed .
For (20.9.4),
from (19.25.1) and Erdélyi et al. (1953b, 13.20(11)) we have
,
where the second equality uses the homogeneity and symmetry of .
Comparison with (20.9.2) proves (20.9.4).
For (20.9.5),
by (19.25.1) the left side is ,
which equals by Erdélyi et al. (1953b, 13.19(4)).
See §§22.2 and 23.6(i) for the relations of Jacobian and
Weierstrass elliptic functions to theta functions.
The relations (20.9.1) and (20.9.2) between and
(or ) are solutions of Jacobi’s inversion problem;
see Baker (1995) and Whittaker and Watson (1927, pp. 480–485).
As a function of , is the elliptic modular function; see
Walker (1996, Chapter 7) and (23.15.2), (23.15.6).