In applications in physics, engineering, and applied mathematics, (see Friedman (1990)), the Dirac delta distribution (§1.16(iii)) is historically and customarily replaced by the Dirac delta (or Dirac delta function) . This is a symbolic function with the properties:
1.17.1 | |||
, , | |||
and
1.17.2 | |||
, | |||
subject to certain conditions on the function . From the mathematical standpoint the left-hand side of (1.17.2) can be interpreted as a generalized integral in the sense that
1.17.3 | |||
for a suitably chosen sequence of functions , . Such a sequence is called a delta sequence and we write, symbolically,
1.17.4 | |||
. | |||
An example of a delta sequence is provided by
1.17.5 | |||
In this case
1.17.6 | |||
for all functions that are continuous when , and for each , converges absolutely for all sufficiently large values of . The last condition is satisfied, for example, when as , where is a real constant.
More generally, assume is piecewise continuous (§1.4(ii)) when for any finite positive real value of , and for each , converges absolutely for all sufficiently large values of . Then
1.17.7 | |||
Formal interchange of the order of integration in the Fourier integral formula ((1.14.1) and (1.14.4)):
1.17.8 | |||
yields
1.17.9 | |||
The inner integral does not converge. However, for ,
1.17.10 | |||
Hence comparison with (1.17.5) shows that (1.17.9) can be interpreted as a generalized integral (1.17.3) with
1.17.11 | |||
provided that is continuous when , and for each , converges absolutely for all sufficiently large values of (as in the case of (1.17.6)). Then comparison of (1.17.2) and (1.17.9) yields the formal integral representation
1.17.12 | |||
Other similar integral representations of the Dirac delta that appear in the physics and applied mathematics literature include the following:
1.17.15 | |||
, . | |||
See Seaton (2002a).
1.17.16 | |||
See Vallée and Soares (2010, §3.5.3).
In the language of physics and applied mathematics, these equations indicate the normalizations chosen for these non- improper eigenfunctions of the differential operators (with derivatives respect to spatial co-ordinates) which generate them; the normalizations (1.17.12_1) and (1.17.12_2) are explicitly derived in Friedman (1990, Ch. 4), the others follow similarly. Equations (1.17.12_1) through (1.17.16) may re-interpreted as spectral representations of completeness relations, expressed in terms of Dirac delta distributions, as discussed in §1.18(v), and §1.18(vi) Further mathematical underpinnings are referenced in §1.17(iv).
Formal interchange of the order of summation and integration in the Fourier summation formula ((1.8.3) and (1.8.4)):
1.17.17 | |||
yields
1.17.18 | |||
The sum does not converge, but (1.17.18) can be interpreted as a generalized integral in the sense that
1.17.19 | |||
where
1.17.20 | |||
provided that is continuous and of period ; see §1.8(ii).
By analogy with §1.17(ii) we have the formal (-periodic) series representation
1.17.21 | |||
Other similar series representations of the Dirac delta that appear in the physics literature include the following:
1.17.22 | |||
1.17.23 | |||
1.17.24 | |||
1.17.25 | |||