[go: up one dir, main page]
CodeQL documentation
CodeQL resources

Use of a broken or weak cryptographic hashing algorithm on sensitive data

ID: rust/weak-sensitive-data-hashing
Kind: path-problem
Security severity: 7.5
Severity: warning
Precision: high
Tags:
   - security
   - external/cwe/cwe-327
   - external/cwe/cwe-328
   - external/cwe/cwe-916
Query suites:
   - rust-code-scanning.qls
   - rust-security-extended.qls
   - rust-security-and-quality.qls

Click to see the query in the CodeQL repository

A broken or weak cryptographic hash function can leave data vulnerable, and should not be used in security-related code.

A strong cryptographic hash function should be resistant to:

  • Pre-image attacks. If you know a hash value h(x), you should not be able to easily find the input x.

  • Collision attacks. If you know a hash value h(x), you should not be able to easily find a different input y with the same hash value h(x) = h(y).

  • Brute force. For passwords and other data with limited input space, if you know a hash value h(x), you should not be able to find the input x even using a brute force attack (without significant computational effort). As an example, both MD5 and SHA-1 are known to be vulnerable to collision attacks.

All of MD5, SHA-1, SHA-2 and SHA-3 are weak against offline brute forcing, so they are not suitable for hashing passwords. This includes SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512, which are in the SHA-2 family.

Since it’s OK to use a weak cryptographic hash function in a non-security context, this query only alerts when these are used to hash sensitive data (such as passwords, certificates, usernames).

Recommendation

Ensure that you use a strong, modern cryptographic hash function, such as:

  • Argon2, scrypt, bcrypt, or PBKDF2 for passwords and other data with limited input space where a dictionary-like attack is feasible.

  • SHA-2, or SHA-3 in other cases. Note that special purpose algorithms, which are used to ensure that a message comes from a particular sender, exist for message authentication. These algorithms should be used when appropriate, as they address common vulnerabilities of simple hashing schemes in this context.

Example

The following examples show hashing sensitive data using the MD5 hashing algorithm that is known to be vulnerable to collision attacks, and hashing passwords using the SHA-3 algorithm that is weak to brute force attacks:

// MD5 is not appropriate for hashing sensitive data.
let mut md5_hasher = md5::Md5::new();
...
md5_hasher.update(emergency_contact); // BAD
md5_hasher.update(credit_card_no); // BAD
...
my_hash = md5_hasher.finalize();

// SHA3-256 is not appropriate for hashing passwords.
my_hash = sha3::Sha3_256::digest(password); // BAD

To make these secure, we can use the SHA-3 algorithm for sensitive data and Argon2 for passwords:

// SHA3-256 *is* appropriate for hashing sensitive data.
let mut sha3_256_hasher = sha3::Sha3_256::new();
...
sha3_256_hasher.update(emergency_contact); // GOOD
sha3_256_hasher.update(credit_card_no); // GOOD
...
my_hash = sha3_256_hasher.finalize();

// Argon2 is appropriate for hashing passwords.
let argon2_salt = argon2::password_hash::Salt::from_b64(salt)?;
my_hash = argon2::Argon2::default().hash_password(password.as_bytes(), argon2_salt)?.to_string(); // GOOD

References

  • © GitHub, Inc.
  • Terms
  • Privacy