The relevance of digital art and digitalization of art, as a more general category, reflecting th... more The relevance of digital art and digitalization of art, as a more general category, reflecting the modern technological approach to this sphere of human activity, is manifested in mainstreaming of legal regulation of various aspects of digital technologies impact on the sphere of creativity and their inclusion in the legislative agenda. The article reveals the legal features of digitalization of art at the present stage. It examines the main areas of digitalization of art and legal means to ensure their support. The broad and narrow approaches to the concept of “digital art” have been outlined. The issues of defining intellectual property rights for the results of creativity (works) produced with artificial intelligence and increasing access to works of art and cultural objects in the digital age have been analyzed. The paper applies interdisciplinary approach, methods of analysis and synthesis, abstraction as well as formal-legal and comparative-legal methods. Based on the analysis...
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Humanitarian Series, 2018
Traditional method of international law is consensual one. Regional integration needs special met... more Traditional method of international law is consensual one. Regional integration needs special methodology. The article reveals peculiarities of different methods of regional integration (intergovernmental, Community method, method of open coordination). The examples of application of integration methods in practice of different regional organizations are given. The EU law-making process is characterized with regards to choice of the method of legal regulation. The integration process demands wider application of community methods of legal regulation. However, some mechanisms for balancing the interests of diverse actors of integration are necessary, including through interaction and codependence of the latter in supranational methodology of regional integration.
Рассматриваются теоретические и практические аспекты правового статуса индивида в международных с... more Рассматриваются теоретические и практические аспекты правового статуса индивида в международных судах и трибуналах. Автор предлагает взглянуть на то, каким образом физические лица участвуют в международных судебных инстанциях, для понимания эволюции статуса индивида в мировом правопорядке в целом. Подход, представленный в статье, базируется на концепции инклюзивного участия. Подчеркивается всеобщая тенденция расширения locus standi и locus standi in judicia. Автор анализирует статус заявителя, ответчика, иных участников (таких как свидетели, жертвы), охватывая различные международные юрисдикции, где индивид имеет процессуальное положение (правозащитные механизмы, административные трибуналы, система международной уголовной юстиции), и даже обращается к практике Международного суда ООН, где формально индивид не может участвовать в процессе, для раскрытия и обоснования общей гуманизации международного процессуального права.
The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union was created in 2015 as a judicial organ with jurisdictio... more The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union was created in 2015 as a judicial organ with jurisdiction over a range of subject matters within the Eurasian Economic Union. It replaced the Court of the Eurasian Economic Community, which operated within the Eurasian Economic Community and its Customs Union (2012-2014). Though the Union become the next step in the integration process of the post-Soviet area, the newly created Court has not been given de jure a successor status. The Court of the Union was set up anew as one of the four institutional bodies in the structure of the Union. It was empowered to settle disputes between the Member States, as well as to consider different types of actions brought by private actors (economic entities only). The interpretative function of the Court was enshrined as “competence on clarification.” Moreover, the Commission, the main executive and regulative organ, was not given locus standi in actions against the Member States to enhance their compliance...
The relevance of digital art and digitalization of art, as a more general category, reflecting th... more The relevance of digital art and digitalization of art, as a more general category, reflecting the modern technological approach to this sphere of human activity, is manifested in mainstreaming of legal regulation of various aspects of digital technologies impact on the sphere of creativity and their inclusion in the legislative agenda. The article reveals the legal features of digitalization of art at the present stage. It examines the main areas of digitalization of art and legal means to ensure their support. The broad and narrow approaches to the concept of “digital art” have been outlined. The issues of defining intellectual property rights for the results of creativity (works) produced with artificial intelligence and increasing access to works of art and cultural objects in the digital age have been analyzed. The paper applies interdisciplinary approach, methods of analysis and synthesis, abstraction as well as formal-legal and comparative-legal methods. Based on the analysis...
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Humanitarian Series, 2018
Traditional method of international law is consensual one. Regional integration needs special met... more Traditional method of international law is consensual one. Regional integration needs special methodology. The article reveals peculiarities of different methods of regional integration (intergovernmental, Community method, method of open coordination). The examples of application of integration methods in practice of different regional organizations are given. The EU law-making process is characterized with regards to choice of the method of legal regulation. The integration process demands wider application of community methods of legal regulation. However, some mechanisms for balancing the interests of diverse actors of integration are necessary, including through interaction and codependence of the latter in supranational methodology of regional integration.
Рассматриваются теоретические и практические аспекты правового статуса индивида в международных с... more Рассматриваются теоретические и практические аспекты правового статуса индивида в международных судах и трибуналах. Автор предлагает взглянуть на то, каким образом физические лица участвуют в международных судебных инстанциях, для понимания эволюции статуса индивида в мировом правопорядке в целом. Подход, представленный в статье, базируется на концепции инклюзивного участия. Подчеркивается всеобщая тенденция расширения locus standi и locus standi in judicia. Автор анализирует статус заявителя, ответчика, иных участников (таких как свидетели, жертвы), охватывая различные международные юрисдикции, где индивид имеет процессуальное положение (правозащитные механизмы, административные трибуналы, система международной уголовной юстиции), и даже обращается к практике Международного суда ООН, где формально индивид не может участвовать в процессе, для раскрытия и обоснования общей гуманизации международного процессуального права.
The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union was created in 2015 as a judicial organ with jurisdictio... more The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union was created in 2015 as a judicial organ with jurisdiction over a range of subject matters within the Eurasian Economic Union. It replaced the Court of the Eurasian Economic Community, which operated within the Eurasian Economic Community and its Customs Union (2012-2014). Though the Union become the next step in the integration process of the post-Soviet area, the newly created Court has not been given de jure a successor status. The Court of the Union was set up anew as one of the four institutional bodies in the structure of the Union. It was empowered to settle disputes between the Member States, as well as to consider different types of actions brought by private actors (economic entities only). The interpretative function of the Court was enshrined as “competence on clarification.” Moreover, the Commission, the main executive and regulative organ, was not given locus standi in actions against the Member States to enhance their compliance...
Uploads
Papers