Conference Presentations by Lincoln Nogueira
When learning the Greek language students are loaded with grammatical information that serves to ... more When learning the Greek language students are loaded with grammatical information that serves to indicate morphological inquiries. Today, this information can be easily obtained by one or two clicks of a mouse on the internet or a Bible software program. So, even with classes of Greek, the question remains: what should students do with this basic information, how will it help in advancing to exegesis? I believe no bridge is formed between morphology and syntax to guide in the process towards exegesis. An additional step is needed. The Parts of Speech Diagram is a necessary tool to bridge morphology and syntax. In addition, this methodology (diagramming) can bridge Greek and Theology. I have seen that the tool of diagramming is key, enhancing all areas of Greek studies: acting as a bridge between morphology and grammar, grammar and syntax, and finally between syntax and exegesis (theological/practical interpretation of the text).
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Problem: Learning Greek is a challenging task that demands from both professors and students. It ... more Problem: Learning Greek is a challenging task that demands from both professors and students. It requires skill from teachers to guide students in the development of knowledge without discouraging them in the process. But also from the students who need to build vocabulary, grammar and syntax. By the end of this experience, students are loaded with useful information, but no bridge was formed towards exegesis. Their knowledge is a mere repetition of grammar books, charts and loose titles from syntax. Thesis: The addition of a methodology that can bridge Greek and Theology needs to be present from the beginning of the learning experience as part of the requirement of Greek language. I believe that the tool of Diagramming is key to enhance all areas of Greek studies, so to bridge between morphology and grammar, between grammar and syntax, then finally bridge between syntax and exegesis.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Papers by Lincoln Nogueira
The discipline of New Testament Studies is challenged by the ever-increasing number of approaches... more The discipline of New Testament Studies is challenged by the ever-increasing number of approaches to biblical exegesis. However, these approaches provide new angles and insightful nuances. Today, hermeneutical approaches feature a wide spectrum from detached objectivity to preposterous subjectivity. So, how to decide which methodologies provide meaningful and appropriate interpretations? Chapter one explores how recognized methodologies developed along with its orientations: diachronic, synchronic, and a-chronic. Respectively, these have as formative orientation the author, the text, and the reader. I investigate whether the principle of suspicion—intrinsic to Biblical Studies—is harmful. In the following chapters I use Galatians 2:11–14 as test case; a complex text shown by the diverse interpretations. The second and third chapters explore what is paramount to sound interpretation employing Narrative Criticism and Social-Scientific Criticism. Under the influence of suspicion, doubt...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Paul is notorious for creating/appropriating catch phrases and expressions. It seems that Paul’s ... more Paul is notorious for creating/appropriating catch phrases and expressions. It seems that Paul’s theology is filled with code words such as works of the law, power-of-God, justification by faith, obedience of faith, in Christ, etc. These terminologies represent deeper theological foundations. These become labels of his systematization. Along with these expression, Paul makes use of many prepositional phrases in order to illustrate his point by means of parallels and contrasts. When reading Romans and Galatians it becomes evident that Paul’s use of prepositions become central in providing preferred meaning. These propositions are connected with key terminology such as faith, Christ, sin and law. The interest of this paper is to provide a framework to visualize Paul’s use of hypo with the accusative in Romans and Galatians and how this concept shapes his theological exposition. Four expressions need clarification: Under Sin (Rom 3:9; 7:14; Gal 3:22), under the law and under grace (e.g...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
This project compares John’s description of the events to take place in time and the sequence whi... more This project compares John’s description of the events to take place in time and the sequence which he chose to present them. Story time refers to the events the author describes (the WHAT happens), while discourse time refers to the manner and order of such telling found in the penned words (the HOW is told). Although James Resseguie has produced a Narrative Commentary on the book of Revelation it does not fully demonstrate the temporal framework, especially matters concerning story time and discourse time. The following is explored: A timeline of the story time of Revelation; an analysis of key temporal markers in the book; and places of apparent recapitulation
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
This presentation offers a semantic field analysis of New Testament occurrences of the word πνεῦμ... more This presentation offers a semantic field analysis of New Testament occurrences of the word πνεῦμα in order to group them by contextualized meaning. Applying this methodology to the issue of pneumatology one can better grasp the forefront characteristics of the spirit language to ascertain the biblical assortment of this motif. Discoveries include the major role of the Holy Spirit as portrayed in the New Testament; the misconception of limiting the Spirit’s activities to abstract conceptions; the appeal to research the texts about the Holy Spirit in light of other πνεῦμα usages, including important theological concepts such as the unclean spirits, the seven spirits and the spirit of prophecy. This presentation seeks to explore perhaps what we have not prioritized about collective passages of πνεῦμα. Since some of the debate is dogmatic driven instead of biblically inclined, this investigation might shed light into further discussion in order to allow the biblical data to stand on its own
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Problem: Learning Greek is a challenging task that demands from both professors and students. It ... more Problem: Learning Greek is a challenging task that demands from both professors and students. It requires skill from teachers to guide students in the development of knowledge without discouraging them in the process. But also from the students who need to build vocabulary, grammar and syntax. By the end of this experience, students are loaded with useful information, but no bridge was formed towards exegesis. Their knowledge is a mere repetition of grammar books, charts and loose titles from syntax. Thesis: The addition of a methodology that can bridge Greek and Theology needs to be present from the beginning of the learning experience as part of the requirement of Greek language. I believe that the tool of Diagramming is key to enhance all areas of Greek studies, so to bridge between morphology and grammar, between grammar and syntax, then finally bridge between syntax and exegesis
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
When learning the Greek language students are loaded with grammatical information that serves to ... more When learning the Greek language students are loaded with grammatical information that serves to indicate morphological inquiries. Today, this information can be easily obtained by one or two clicks of a mouse on the internet or a Bible software program. So, even with classes of Greek, the question remains: what should students do with this basic information, how will it help in advancing to exegesis? I believe no bridge is formed between morphology and syntax to guide in the process towards exegesis. An additional step is needed. The Parts of Speech Diagram is a necessary tool to bridge morphology and syntax. In addition, this methodology (diagramming) can bridge Greek and Theology. I have seen that the tool of diagramming is key, enhancing all areas of Greek studies: acting as a bridge between morphology and grammar, grammar and syntax, and finally between syntax and exegesis (theological/practical interpretation of the text)
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
The Pool of Bethesda, and consequently John 5, has been reinterpreted in Jewish circles as an Asc... more The Pool of Bethesda, and consequently John 5, has been reinterpreted in Jewish circles as an Asclepius-Pagan Temple due to a heavily Hellenistic influence in Jerusalem in the first century. This paper seeks to explore this possibility. Further, how this information can elucidate our interpretation of the following discourse of the chapter where Jesus dialogues with the Pharisees. A narrative analysis approach is employed in order to seek repeating snippets of the language John selects to make this whole chapter a unit. At the end, internal data seems to support this theory of it being an Asclepius temple pool at the time Jesus approaches the lame. The subsequent verses accentuate Jesus’ claim that only in him they can find life and by going to wrong places they will never find it. In one more chapter the author presents integration of a particular story-event with intricate dialogues in order to enrich his gospel portrayal. Jesus depicted in a combination of showing and telling. This connection is significant
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
It is undeniable that in both Romans and Galatians Paul discusses the role of the Law. Among prom... more It is undeniable that in both Romans and Galatians Paul discusses the role of the Law. Among prominent Pauline scholars the debate about Covenantal Nomism is ongoing. Very prominent in Paul’s argumentation in Gal 3:6–14 when Paul contrasts blessings with curse; but those who “rely on doing the works of the law are under a curse” (Gal 3:10). So, how to make sense of Paul’s terminology of “Works of the Law” (ex ergōn nomou)? Are the reform perspectives or the so called New Perspective correct in their interpretation of the term, or should we seek an alternative explanation? I will explore Paul’s use of the term in Romans and Galatians while dealing with the false dichotomy between faith and law. Paul’s contention with the Law requires qualification and needs to be understood in light of his approval and respect for the Law
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
The third person of the Godhead has always been a mystery and open to discussion. Unfortunately, ... more The third person of the Godhead has always been a mystery and open to discussion. Unfortunately, the debate is mostly driven by dogmatic theology instead of allowing the biblical data to stand on its own. There are as many interpretations as they come concerning the nature and place of the Spirit among the Father and the Son. Anti-Trinitarian efforts, for example, have indicated (and fixated on) biblical texts that might put in check Christian beliefs in the personality of the Holy Spirit. Albeit these misunderstandings some have put doubt in this Biblical teaching. This poster intends to quantify the characteristics (statistic of occurrences, including names and symbolic language) and divine attributes of the person of the Holy Spirit. Surely Biblical revelation has created reasonable amount of data that can gear towards an understanding of this belief. One that is not based on proof-text approach, but an understanding based on quantifiable data provided by the New Testament author...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Conference Presentations by Lincoln Nogueira
Papers by Lincoln Nogueira